I'm thinking like $150 for a beater mosin, 275 for a beater mauser

Literally these fudds think an M44 is $400

Usually gonna be fair

Mauser 06/08 is fine but have you heard of the Mannlicher M1894?

NIC STOP

Average 91/30 price is $250 now

Ew

I bought mine for $75

Would not even consider 3 digits

The mauser is great but have you heard of ***THE WAUSER***

I wouldnt pay more than hi point prices for a mosin, honestly.

Besides, all other guns are inferior when compared to a G3 chambered in 7.92

Because fuck your shoulders

And your arms

And the other guy

I'd trust a hi-point over a mosin

@RoflTank Pee es gee

Besto

And everybody that has to hear you

And god help you if you have a muzzle break

Oh good I saw some dumb Boomer selling a PTR with a scope as a PSG

>he would rather get rekt by G3 recoil than the recoil of an MG3 from the shoulder

As an addendum: fuck boomers

We also have this fucking nonce who shows up and sells " *BANNED*" steel core 7.62x39 in little Ziploc bags

>Implying 7.92 is higher pressure than 7.62x51

All in favor say "Aye"

Higher mass and muzzle energy, higher ft/lb than 7.62NATO

Pre ban is a test that means nothing

Some dumb fucking nonce was selling 'pre ban AK mags'

There's no bans of any kind in NC btw

They were also Korean grey phosphate

>south of yankee land
>gun bans 🤣😂

>unironically buying AKs

You can tell Korean AK mags right away as they're ar15 mag colored

Lmao slavaboo faggot

>Unironically thinking the AK is a shit platform

>he doesn't buy AKs

AK is pretty shit

It's an outdated peice of shit with no effect over 300m and accuracy unacceptable by any military force over 100m

It's good for certain things

@RoflTank (you)

>Implying any modern pistol is superior to the Type 94

It's good for sand niggers and commie larpers

But ar15 > ak

Unpopular opinion: The AK is *Fun*

I like

kill guns

The AR-15 is just as shitty

>the standard by which all is compared

Both obsolete pieces of shit kept alive by dumbasses and boomers and dumbass boomers

I guess I can respect a position where you think both AR and AK platforms are shit but I still dont understand it

>he doesn't consider the AK the standard

>the most common firearm on the whole planet

AR-15 is 40 years old and well beyond reasonable service life for a platform

Just don't put a 2lb fucking cheesegrater on the AR and you're good

>Implying the Federov isnt the best Assault rifle

Also fuck the forward assist

Hot take: The AR-15 is just an updated StG.44

5.56 is being used in guns with a 14-16in barrel when it was literally designed for 20in barrels, and based on the WWII design of the assault rifle for engagements within a 200-300m envelope

Despite modern engagements being well in to the 800m range

The M16 was fine and the m4 is bad

And both NATO rounds being fucking garbage at these ranges

And still adequate Rofl. In addition, the AR-15 is one of the easier rifles to rechamber for new rounds. Everything from .22 LR to .50BMG and 20mm uppers for AR-15s exist.

It's inadequate

Modern engagements *Sometimes* reach into 800m

but if everyone uses an assault rifle that cant engage well past 300 but they engage at 800 whats the issue? seems like a fair fight to me

Most are within 200m

Artillery does our 800m

An overwhelming majority under 100m

They are routinely beyond 200m

The problem is the word police bullshit

To the point that infantry are bitching to bring back battel rifles because 5.56 is inadequate

>Same infantry will begin bitching about recoil

5.56 is inadequate in desert patrols

Infantry bitch about everything

@RoflTank Okay, so the AR-15 is inadequate. In what ways is it lacking? Are there any ways for those shortcomings to be addressed without fucking with the design too much? If not, what do you propose to take its place?

The US army moves on artillery, and we're just holding back because we're acting as police in the middle east

>Inb4 XM8

"my armor is heavy", "my armor is too light", "my gun is too big", "my gun can't kill past 300m", "my gun has too much recoil", "my ammo is too heavy"

M16 fine

@RoflTank You have not addressed any of my questions. Do you intend to do so?

And if you're going to go with a 16" barrel the dissipator was a better idea than an m4

It needs to be rebuilt to accept new tech and calibers, and the controls are antiquated.

There is no new tech

The design needs a complete internal rework

so if they bitch about everything why are you using them bitching about one specific thing to add credibility to your position?

Because it they're bitching about a factual, observable problem that's not just them being whiny faggots

Literally any downside of the ar15 can be swapped

Says who? you?

It is an amorphous blob that can be altered to fit any role

So stopping power is the problem with the AR-15?

It is the modular rifle that the stoner 63 wishes it was

Says mountains of combat reports that consistently showing infantry carbines being inadequate at ranges over 300m

7.62 NATO upper.

Boom. Problem solved.

And good luck getting a proper recoil buffer and controlling heat buildup

a 7.62 nato upper on an M16?

The M16 lower can't do 7.62 nato

at that point you just issue everyone an AR 10

That's the Bushmaster