Do you prefer Himmler? Or Rommel?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbim2kGwhpc

Rommel ftw

im just saying hitler specifically was a shitter

rommel

he made p bad decisions

and some great

also if u think about it

like securing oil reserves insouth russia/ukraine

instead of attacking moscow directly

i mean all of that is imperialism and fuck that shit

Soviet Russia later installed Regimes throughout Eastern Europe, essentuslly making an Imperial Power in the East.

🆙 | **Kraiser leveled up!**

Ok

germany shouldnt have invaded the soviet union in the first place tbh

better off maintaining a single front war

They really didn't have a choice.

@Rythm

**My prefix here is `+`**

The Soviet Union was planning an Assault on the Eagle at the same time, yet it was due to occur 14 days after Barbarossa happened.

yes they did

stalins main focus was developing productive forces at that time

thats the entire reason the non aggression pact was signed

stalins plan to invade was due to late 1944 or maybe even 1945

He saw the West battering each other almost into oblivion. If that was ever to break, he certainly would've taken Berlin.

yes

but hitler invaded in 1941

before he was able to take britain

I prefer tea to vodka anyways...

<:fake:446311269348278272>

Oh, wait, trivia question...

..who was worse than the Nazi's?

Commies

in what aspect

and Fortnite player

morality?

No, during the War.

during the war

i mean

thats hard

Japan

With War Crimes.

America was the worst ngl

japan

the north african front under rommel was definitely more "morally good" than the dresden bombing

using atom bombs when it wasn't needed

then theres the rape of nanking

Both Japan and an Independent Croatia are acceptable anwsers.

If Göring hadn't claimed the Luftwaffe was capable of singlehandedly getting victory over the UK and the Nazis had launched an invasion of Britain, they would've had their ports and would've been able to bring all the Jews to Madagascar like Heydrich suggested

Whats the question here?

@Marker acually conventional carpet bombing would lead to the same casualities too

Literally everyone was worse than the Germans in ww2

Croatian Death Camps were vicious enough to leave German High Command disgusted.

https://i.imgur.com/klGDqNH.png Japan

yes

the soviets were not ready for war

yes but using the atom bombs knowing that they would kill so many more civilians and fucking up the land

honestly as a blanket statement definitely japan

germany wasnt either

another reason why hitler is a fucking dumbass

japan did

@Marker At least it wasn't a slow death for them

so much

shit

in china

the original plan for germany was to be ready for way in the late 1940s

@Marker it was either the bombs or a full-scale Invasion...

@Flash ever heard of cancer lol

but hitler wanted the war to happen in his lifetime

because he was pretty unhealthy

and was a dumbass

actually germany wanted a diplomaticly united europe

like the EU

kinda failed there

also

Congratulations, @viridian for reaching level 3!

A full-scale Invasion of Japan was estimated to leave over 20 Million people dead total.

the atomic bombings of japan were competely uneeded

and were only done to flex on the soviet union and test the weapon

wtf

no

@Kraiser thats incorrect lmao

ehhhh 20 million sounds a bit high

the estimates varied from 200,000 to 2 million

very wide

plus

250k died in the bombings right?

JAPAN WAS ABOUT TO SURRENDER

japan was literally about to surrener

That's because most Citizens still had the will to fight for the Emperor.

why do u think they surrendered

@Kraiser did the atomic bombinhs play a part in the surrender of japan?

yes or no

it didnt surrender beacuse of atomic bombs

what do u think

@viridian It took two bombs to make them surrender

@Flash no it didnt

it surrendered beacuse of the USSR

@viridian the High Command surrendered, the Citizens were willing to die for their Country.

the japanese counsel to surrender began BEFORE THE NAGASAKI BOMB WAS DDROPPED