Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 487436362749050910
No, you've just built up a plethora of assumptions, and are just nuh uh-ing every aspect
We fight over this for hours and you never address my points.
Which is what you've done every time
THAT'S WHAT YOUR DOING!
Is tim tam the jim jam a lizard? why he have trouble pronouncing basic words?
Just give me you plan!
The sites are not going to survive lol
Type up what you propose to do instead.
Stop using them, encourage others to stop using them
Amplify every mistake they make
Except that's not how it works.
There are plenty
People aren't leaving social media.
It's too ingrained.
>no site has ever died. People have never left websites
No, they move from one to another.
But the alternatives aren't much better.
Leave Tinder for Bumble.
One of these bans anyone with a picture of a gun.
One of these is more social justice than the other.
You do nothing but say "it's all going to just die" and never give a reason why.
And then you "nuh-uh" me whenever I tell you *exactly* why this needs to be addressed.
That's fine. It's not up to us to police which stupid alternative people pick
And when I give more reasons you repeat yourself.
Then get silenced.
No, you assert that it needs to be addressed because you're placing undue emphasis on fucking twitter
And its role in society
No, I'm asserting that the social media giants are starting to gain absolute control and it needs to be opposed.
And as Europe and the Democrats are going to regulate it and via a cooperation of government and corporate power silence any opposition now and in the future, the only plausible solution is to preemptively regulate.
And things only get worse as freedom of speech becomes a paper tiger.
You're just saying "it's all going to die and deserves to die anyway, lol" Which isn't addressing anything.
Like how people will always seek social connections and will, and have, always found them. And as long as the internet exists, they will form social media giants.
Preemptive regulation doesn't stop Europe from regulating
No, but it does prevent it from coming over here.
And it's not entirely preemptive either. Europe has already done it in parts.
Like you can have your pro freedom bill and Germany will still have the cuck bill, and then what?
We have freedom on this side of the Atlantic, at the very least.
You have some freedoms*
You'd just propose we have cuck bill on both sides because the social media companies will go with Germany by default.
Technicalities not addressing the point and not elaborated anyway.