Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 487443948780912641
But the thing is that either the Dems can't cuck the supreme court, or you were fucked anyway
You place way too much emphasis on precidents.
The arguments to overturn your precidents are common in law schools.
More common than the arguments for the status quo.
And the forces of censorship want to make it even more that way.
You're naive if you think the goal isn't to turn the censorious and one-sided style of academia into the broader society.
>it's easy to overturn the checks and balances of the country
>it's impossible to overturn a regulation or law
And there are reasons the arguments are so one sided in the academy.
Sure. Fine. You can overturn or change things later.
But the regulations are coming.
Then they're coming no matter what
And the power is all one sided once the censorship is sufficiently underway.
And there's fuck all you can do about it by your own logic
No, I'm saying you force open the channel so you can *fight at all*
You'd lose the platform and then just say "lol we just burn it" without a fight.
>blue wave
>dems get majority
Oh boy, how do you fight now?
I don't know. Which is why this needed to be done yesterday.
Oooh now who could it be? https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1037880524516282370?s=19
My bet is Mattis
>we need to change a changeable factor before people can inevitably change it
Like literally from the perspective you're arguing, abandon ship is the more logical option
Mattis would never do this anonymous leaking shit.
I'm arguing this from *your* rebuttals m8
Please use one fallacy right today
Hmm, older, conservative, Male
Yeah that doesn't exactly narrow it down...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_Donald_Trump>
Atleast the brick wall doesn't misunderstand fallacies.
If Mattis wanted to stop Trump from doing something he'd tell him to his face. Mattis isn't some coward who would stoop to this shit.
Honestly, how much does it matter? There's probably a whole cabal. It may not have even been penned by someone we'd name recognize.
Like a 2nd or 3rd in command of some agency like the FBI.
>misused adhom
>misused non sequitur
>NoU
I guess if an official did write it the upside is that it becomes hard for media to deny the existence of a 'deep state'.
They quit that story a little while ago.
Its now that the deep state is doing a patriotic duty to resist Trump.
We were always at war with Eurasia, Comrade
"Whether or not it's actually true is irrelevant." - MSM
Dems are the reason Kavanaugh is getting in, the idiots thought to short term in changing the rules to get their own and now its backfiring