Message from @Malt_Hitman
Discord ID: 492500711381139470
"If you have to ask..." /s
false. the left would
who's read benito mussolini's 1932 "the doctrine of fascism"?
Give me the tldr
who reads?
its a lot like the european court of human rights articles
is there a videogame about it?
reading 😂 😂 😂 😂
na fam 🌠 👍 👌 👌 👌
its like "hey you can do anything you want! but we will arrest you if you do it..."
jk but seriously. all my reading is mainly MS material
sims might be the videogame version of that book
oh so wait, its like gta5
MS material?
ah, sorry. master's.
they say youre done with scyool after undergrad. Nope!
At least it's not slave's material.
read the UNuniversal human rights articles.... then read the doctrine of fascism ... then read the european court of human rights... and tell me they didnt just rip everything from mussoini
huh
ill add those to my list. <:TimThink:482277772497125378> materials always good.
so a quote from mussolini (from memory) ... "fascism accepts the individual" ... that would be where the UNs HR ends... it continues... "only in so far as his interests coincide with the states"
also. if they were.blind stinking drunk how couls they manage to pin her down??
now lemme copy the ECHR article on freedom...
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right
shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart
information and ideas without interference by public authority
and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States
from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema
enterprises.
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it
duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities,
conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and
are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national
security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention
of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for
the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing
the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for
maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
tldr "we accept your freedom; only in so far as your interests coincide with the states"
btw... UNs version..
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
see how it just ends at "you have freedom" 😛
It seems like the governments of Europe were all in agreement that authoritarianism works. The only question for the past 100 years was who was going to be in charge.
wait. the un version is the short one??
yeah
UN = freedom of the individual
ECHR = state comes before individual
UN = Freedom of the individual, unless it's offensive
Never forget their letter to Japan
And that they had Saint Anita there talking about how it was violence that people said that she "sucked." Or something like that.
i dont think the UN has anywhere near the amount of influence over a sovereign nation inside it than the EU does
if the EU was like the UN ... brexit would probably not have happened
theyd pull a czech uprising on it
Oh absolutely. I'm glad the UN basically can't do shit
Because their decisions have been awful
Pretty sure Anita didn't actually talk to the real UN, but the UN women's commission
the UN ambassadors for both the UK and US are female
doesnt matter much. ive read mult. places say UN is inundated with socjus and feminist ideology