and all over Europe

Possibly

theories suggest they reached north america too

Lol?

North America prior to 1965 used to be the greatest pool of Nordic genes on Earth

but yeah i get what you wanted to say

no, some viking botes reached north america or something

Yep

Eric the Red if I'm correct

ragnar is my nigga

no, prior to him

was the theory

a "who reached north america first" shit

Obviously, Native Americans, from Siberia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solutrean_hypothesis

Y dna R haplogroup found in native americans

no, people reaching north america by bote

haplogroup stuff can be pretty much dismissed as far as big theories are concerned

they can be used to spot or corelate very specific characteristic

but not great relations because according to them, Finns and Mongols are more related than Finns and Swedes which is nonsense

there's many of thous haplogroups and each one represents different set of traits

AFAIK

bote is much better spelling than boat

yes but, there is almost no R haplogroup in East and South-East asians

then some R found its way from another path

truly the superior spelling

bote

I'm not sure about NA

I'm aware of many theories but kind of lack any substantial data to make conclusions

Different thing completely when it coms to Europeans

remove trucucc

canda deserves better

Even with all unsurmountable evidence that says Europeans pretty much came from Eurasian steppe

There are som still hardcores which claim Europeans always lived in Europe which is nonsense

well if they count basques and samis as europeans

then its maybe

Whoever lived in Europe simply had to be conquered by Eurasian peoples who lived in large, blood-related tribes, being nomads and stuff

Europeans came from 4 different gene-pools, 1) native hunter-gatherers, 2) western european farmaers, 3) middle-east farmers, 4) indo-european (siberia)

not to mention climate in Eurasian steppe

good point WhiteTree

prior to Indo-European expansion, there were agrarian cultures in Europe