sorry didn't mean to distract, continue

I agree. Maybe we're talking about different things. My issue is that she believed not only that she could throw a wrench into his nomination but could do so via anonymous claims.

https://infotel.ca/newsitem/a-racist-is-right-wing-kamloops-dad-has-questions-about-kids-homework-assignment/it56188

I've seen few bring this up specifically.

People yell "due process" but seem to ignore that she explicitly said she didn't want due process by saying she wanted to influence the situation via anonymous claims.

@trapexit no wait

no

not necessarily true

lets be clear here

Yes you are right that she wanted to throw it in via "anonymous" claims

in reality they knew who she was

so lets say "confidential" claims

yeah?

OK, so part of this would have been, at that time, the FBI would have had to come out to question here

that would have been sOP

SOP

IF THE DEMS HADNT HELD IT

That information would have had to become public

why?

based on what?

Unless the government explicitly defined it classified

no

the fbi report isn't making it public

shit i mean right now the dems are advocating that it be kept within the senate

and republicans appear ready to say yes to it

It'll get leaked. Atleast in parts.

I would imagine a FOIA request could change that.

These things never stay silent. Even if it were "top secret"

@pratel im not arguing that that could happen. But I am tyring to say she stupid because she's naive in believing it would actually be kept confidential

The Dems might make it classified, but I guarantee they'd leak parts they like anyway.

of cours

And the Republicans would respond in kind.

*course

@trapexit would it?

we'd have to ask tim

he'd probably know

everyone just spam mention tim

I'd be a bit surprised if these reports for public offices would be restricted. Redacted... sure... but not totally off limits.

if you go to foia.gov

senate doesnt show up

fbi does...