Two were true 🤔

The moon.

Gravitational dooblydoo.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/07/world/climate-change-new-ipcc-report-wxc/index.html

O'Reilly also had the issue of Fox News throwing him under the bus, cause the new people in charge hated his guts.

man made climate change is just big nothing.

higher CO2 is just benefit.

Man made made climate change might be false, but that doesn't mean humans don't hurt nature in other ways and endanger their survival in the process.

It's plausible to think that man has some effect on the environment, but the ridiculous hyperbole out of the Al Gores of the world has hurt the environmentalist cause and the cures they propose are worse than the disease.

yeah of course polutin nature is bad.

You know, when I think about it climate change might not be that bad. If all the icecaps melted California, New York, Oregon and Vancouver would be underwater

So you don't think we're fucked by 2030?

if you are interested about why climate change is pushed so hard. read about UN agenda 21.

There are 7.7 billion people and climbing. It's not possible to support that many mouths on a pre-industrial economic model. The solution is not regression, but technological advancement. Elon Musk has the right idea with Tesla. Change through genuinely better market alternatives, not government force.

Well, if they think we are going to have a runaway greenhouse effect by 2030 they are idiots. ALL of the carbon on the earth used to be in the air and the planet didn't fry.

Now, if they mean that is the point of no return where we will have a hothouse earth, sure that could happen.

Also, if people genuinely believed that there would be a runaway greenhouse effect in 2030, there would be a real estate boom in northern Canada. You wouldn't be able to buy a piece of tundra for love or money.

<<<lives in northern Canada

I want you guys to realize

That if climate change was as bad as everyone said, it would still be a good thing

"Why is that Scrib"

Well I'll tell you

"Goodie!"

Calm down.

i don't care, the sealevel should rise by 400 meters ... overnight. that would take care of overpopulation and pollution

We are a tropical species.

There's a lot of land we don't get to use.

Canada is on this knife-edge of livability.

Canada would benefit radically from this shit.

And it wouldn't happen overnight.

And yes, there'd be some losses.

Only with natural gas to stop us from freezing when it gets to -40 every year

But if climate change were as BAD AS EVERYONE SAYS

(And it isn't)

There'd be greatness in it.

http://flood.firetree.net/

turn that to +60 meters and tell my what the problem is

yeah sure, northern germany would be smaller, as would the eastcoast and mississipppiii

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDK1aCqqZkQ

I really wish Crowder wouldn't title his videos that.

It's like dousing a steak in castor oil for those not convinced.