That seems vaguely fun

@oprahsminge How do you think the oppression hierarchy was justified?

I assume I'll need to decompress after

It's dense at first, but once you get past the first ~20% it's really revealing as to the behavior of extreme leftists.

@Abel using the concept of nothing being the truth

You are a white person, a white person's truth is less than a black person's truth

The extreme left didn't arrive at their behavior in a vacuum. There's an entire philosophical underpinning that is virtually unknown to the average joe.

What I'm trying to point out is that essentially, you can suggest some pretty incredible stuff. When you lay the logic like that out to regular people, they see the inconsistency perfectly

Indeed

Ok. So I guess to rephrase, is this a good way to describe the insanity to someone who is not entirely hooked in to seeing it?

Oh yeah, you can attack postmodernist ideas for a normie audience because normies are mostly modernist though they don't have any idea what that is.

But attacking a postmodernist's ideas using modernist philosophy is pointless as they reject the premise.

I'll listen to the book or read it as I would like to understand the underpinnings of it.

Hence why the best tactic against postmodernists is simply to ridicule them.

Right I get that part. I mean you neednt look further than twitter

Which is a pretty great distillation of the majority of leftists

Sorry I mean the majority of <:NPC:500042527231967262> 's

If you've listened to any of JBP's lecture series you'll find some familiar parts. JBP and Stephen Hicks are pals, though JBP doesn't do the material justice as he's not a professional philosopher.

Postmodernism is incredible, really

It's so flexible that it's bulletproof

I had a philosophy teacher in college (101 I wasnt going to school for it after all) and we touched on the concept of post-modernism. He said it's completely ridiculous as it's inherently flawed.

Oh yeah. Sargon did a video review of Explaining Postmodernism and he was really blown away once he understood how it works.

marxist subversion seems to be effective indeed.

I would like to get a video from @Timcast describing why he thinks the right seems to have such higher engagement with sources of news. Does this tell you anything about the "right"?

Sup you flannel faggot

reeeeeeeeeeeee

<:NPC:500042527231967262>

Npc anger comes for us all

the flannel's new and I'm liking it

Yeah its aigjt

Aight

You just doxxed yaself tho

I accidentally outgrew or shrunk all of last year's warmer shirts because lmao

so I'm replacing it all a few things at a time

I don't care a huge amount, Big Brother already knows where I am.

But yeah, I do try and keep my KC branded accounts at least partially seperate from my real life

turned my old youtube into a King Canuck account, ditto to soundcloud and a few others

gonna be for shitposts while I use my new email I made for college for more serious shenanigans relating to being fake news media

rather, a journo

@Timcast star wars writer gets fired, Encouraged incivility against conservatives https://twitter.com/SophNar0747/status/1050839942992207872?s=19

So I'm listening to the link @Atkins but something strikes me already. Please let me know if you agree. It seems that when Jacque Derrida (dunno if spelled right) declares that post modernism is only useful in the context of revolutionary Marxism, that this in an of itself and by it's very necessity, inherently violates the entire concept of post modernism. Is this not a legitimate observation?