Message from @Abaraxs, Lord of Hosts
Discord ID: 339675968228556801
that's the e-mail i recieved from Whitman
@ouroboros LIT
Regression Happens Once
For whatever reason, a lot of people think that regression to the mean will keep happening to someone’s descendants until they research original population’s mean. This is not true. Once the next generation inherits an additive genetic advantage in some trait it keeps it. Their kids and their grand kids will continue to have it.
Were this not true, evolution would be impossible. Every time a mutation resulted in a genetic change in a trait the next few generations would simply regress back to where the trait was before. Evolution happens, and so regression to the mean clearly does not work this way.
Let’s imagine that my height is 100% the result of a new additive mutation that makes people 50% further, in a positive direction, from their sexes mean height than average. Let’s also assume that my mate has the same new mutation. We are the only two people who have it. We will both give that mutation our kids. They will be just as tall as us. After all, they have the same genes that made us tall. There is nowhere else for the genes to go. Thus, no regression to the mean happens, right?
Well, yes and no. Yes, my kids are just as far from the original population’s height mean as I am. However, the population’s mean height has changed. Thanks to the new mutation being given to my kids, the population’s mean height has risen. Thus, the distance between my kids height and the population mean is less than the initial distance between my height and the population mean was. So, there is a sense in which, as the mutation continues to be spread across the population, everyone will return to “the mean”. But it will be a new mean, and that is not regression to the mean.
Catholicism is the third position of religion https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17576356/
so it marries volk with loyalty to God?
sounds about right
trad cath that is
@vaultright got any good stuff explaining how Sub suharan africans are far worse than 'African Americans' ?
Jews aren't human
Do you see slavs as White?
Me on the other hand I look like belong in some cave in the depths of Afghanistan
Or driving an Uber speaking Armenian
Same difference tbh
Kek
Slavs are indo european they are white
Well, Indians are also Indo-Europeans
And Iranians
Armenians, Kurds, Georgians
You see what I am getting at kek?
@Abaraxs, Lord of Hosts are you white?
And all those people would have been much whiter before the turkish and arab invasions
I would describe myself as white.
Sounds iffy...
Kek, I agree.
But to answer you, I have brown wavey hair, hazel eyes and tanned skin.
Atleast, I am not a chimpanize or a nigger.
Other wise, I wouldn't be able to make this conversation we are having currently.
Hazel eyes are master race eyes my dood
😉