Message from @Icarus
Discord ID: 319579470484996096
indirect threats of violence are covered under free speech laws iirc
or rather
unspecific
in the US maybe I suppose
lol
i'm getting oddly paranoid, heh
Boomer posting - could it be getting redpilled?
BRING IT NIGGERS!!!!!!!
👌 🇺🇸
Sad that it's intended for Jews to use against Russians , not niggers
I think we're gonna give it to jap'n
remember goyim, Muslims are the future of Europe
think about the environment goy, no one else will
?play s
<:dynoError:314691684455809024> You should be in a voice channel first.
I trolled the fuck out of him after I saw that response
I said don't feel bad about Manchester, think of the carbon offsetting
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915480/Without-Jews-Britain-not-Britain-warns-Theresa-fears-exodus-wake-anti-Semitic-attacks.html
We must secure the existence of world kikery and a future for mongrel children
🤔
The security services are demanding new powers that would make it easier for them to monitor the communications of terror suspects, a demand supported by Lord Evans, a former head of MI5. He warned that leaps in technology meant Britain’s anti-terror laws were ‘no longer fit for purpose’.
‘It would be bizarre if we were to reach a position where the benefits of new technology were available to terrorists, but forbidden to the security agencies and police,’ he said.
That basically means to monitor white nationalists
*waves*
Its pretty obvious this seth rich bullshit is more like theatre that will never reach conclusion whilst hordes of nonwhites flood into white homelands.
Wew lad
Refugees from where...
That is exactly what I'm wondering
Ergh
Masked gunman storms Manila hotel and opens fire in brutal 'casino chips ...