https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm

@everyone mike enoch is goy confirmed

> ye shall know them by their fruits

@vaultright WHAT'S THE 0.1% ????

its the basics of dna testing dude you cant be 100% certain

Seriously, how does this redeem him?

it doesnt

What did Mike do, other than marry a noseberg? I'm a bit behind.

-lied about it
-still lies about it
-got other people to lie about it

-acts like it's no big deal
-gets everyone defending him to throw standards overboard

(most recently: Anglin)

So he's not the enemy, he's just irresponsible.

It's cancer either way.

I know. A wayward ally can be just as dangerous as somebody trying to kill you.

It's a painful thing I've learned about human nature. When confronted with coming with with a difficult truth and lying, most people will lie, no matter how alienating to one's peers and duties it might be.

Well... most often lying _is_ the easy way out. But if someone can be made to lie against his heartfelt conviction, for whatever reason, he will do it again more readily than the first time.

At this point this is not about Enoch anymore but about them compromising and dragging down their audience. And this wouldn't be such a big issue if it weren't for Sven

plus trs and enoch are all homo enablers

you mean the ghoul thing?

I can't say I fault them for that. Personally, I believe a hands-off approach should be taken regarding the gays.
Much like the Jews: remove all taboos and worrying about people's feelings, allow for a society that allows absolute freedom of association and expression, and let society react accordingly.

"There are HOW many Jews in the media? Holy fucking shit..." a convention citizen would say. "WHAT percentage of pedophiles are gay? Wow..."

They're low on my list of priorities, below niggers, arabs and jews. They'd be even lower if so many of them didn't embrace the "standard fuckparty" mentality.

and yet.... all the big alt-right venues have been infested by faggots and enablers.

I HOPE it's a tactical decision on their part.

We can answer the fag question as soon as we answer the white genocide one, and we would lose a lot of support (what little we have) if the movement was openly anti-LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ@!

I'm just a bit happy that Spencer had the balls to talk about trannies as "a man wanting to mutilate his genitals" openly.

You could view it as part of their nature, it maximizes their chances of survival (figuratively).

I think that's arguably the most important part of addressing the tranny question, that and passing hormone blockers to children.

Fucking disgusting.

A lot of support? How many are there? 😯 Is everyone a faggot these days?

Enough to pull the rug out from under our feet, I figure.

Like, for instance, the TRS audience.

They won't be treated like lepers if they choose to turn away from TRS.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying "condone their degeneracy". I'm saying "address what issues what need to be addressed, and close ranks until we have the WG problem under control."

That's the big problem. We lost on that front, we're fucked.

> I'm not saying "condone their degeneracy"
but THEY are, and that's a sign of a shitty character and should never be _allowed_ in leadership. I know it's rare that good people are interested in leading, in a way we have the same issue as established politics in that we have a negative selection, but ffs, it's going to kill us if we allow it.

And honestly, breh, people already treat us like lepers.

I'm not saying we allow it.
Freedom of association, freedom of expression. That's all we need. That, and the truth.

ahhh i'm missing out on all of this hot conversation

hey, no one said it would be easy.