Message from Virtue in Safe Space 3 #lobby-unvetted
Definitely urinated in public before. It was a relief.
We built public toilets for people like you
and the vandals still prefere mailboxes
Maybe we could get catheters
If I urinate in public I will at least use the forest or a harbour..
What is a harbour?
Anyone should avoid this no matter the cost..
I agree it should be avoided. Sometimes you have to weigh the consequences though.
Piss yourself and be forced to be around people who don't want you smelling of piss, or piss on a tree.
A small fee or a stern look would be more than today..
I think I got a point with the public toilets.
You're probably in a more urban environment
If we build public toilets EVERYWHERE
and people dont use them..
then there is only one thing left that can be the cause..
lack of discipline...
Also even if you fucking pay for free public school to everyone..
most kids WILL NOT STUDY
I prefer to be in places where there are trees and mountains. If anyone complains that you're watering a tree, they're to blame for being a snoop.
and if you give free money to unemployed services
THEY WILL NOT SHOW UP
the evidence is everywhere
a large percent of poverty
is caused by lazy motherfuckers who
dont want to job
then rest are hard working poor
who serve to give the parasites a good face.
I think you need to give people in the bottom of society some guidelines
or some restrictions.
untill they prove they can take care of themselves.
I agree. And my stance on these issues varies depending on which dystopian future we're proposing as a fix 😃
okej you asked before why I suggested so many things should be goverment owned or regulated
but none of them would be social welfare... this is why.
also I want the old food banks we used to have BACK
How are food banks different?
And why do you spell things the european way? (harbour)
I live in Sweden so I only know how it is here.
Okay, that makes sense then 😃
No what we used to do in Sweden was
that the food that was not sold or consumed was sold or given
to a food bank.
and the poor could get food copongs.
but then the poor wanted cash instead..
which proves that poor can be assholes
and it defeats the entire purpose
And now they get cash instead of food money? Or as well as food money?
because giving poor people cash
means the food only goes to waste
and .. yeah
Now they just get more goverment aids..
aid I mean..
if you just set a limit right there.. that would have been a reasonable discplay of authority..
you cannot let people in the bottom of society who has no stakes in it
vote and control the conditions
on how the state is helping them..