this dude tripped down an ideological rabbit hole, let him struggle.

The problem is it would require an increadibly resilient culture which would support only the lowest lows of the society and should grow increasingly violent against any attempt by a superior individual to better imself and his immediate family and friends.

literally every human on this planet is part of some hierarchy, and if you dont accept that, its not our problem, its yours

even animals are <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ Sorry, but the rabbit hole is on you.

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

It's not possible to have anarchy

anarchists are just black pilled lazy, greedy people. but its not my job to try and make sense for them.

It's very possible to have an extremely close minded low IQ people who don't have ANY form of government.

Actually there are plenty of real world examples of that.

find a real world argument for anarchism, where it has been implemented and has worked for a community for an extended period of time.

Every example you have of an "anarchy" was just primitive tribes that had their own chieftains and tribal elders running the show

yeah

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ What about the Maya?

that was literally a society

you speng

I dont disagree that these people have room temperature IQ

they had an organized religion, and built structures in huge teams of people to try and reach god.

They had a formidable civilization a thousand years agio and now are just simple tribal farmers and hunter-gatherers.

What about the Maya?

Lmao. What?

over hundreds of years, for a single structure

If you seek social devolution-here is one.

TRIBAL

you're actually so retarded you have to be baiting

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Maya-people

They are tribal AND live under the Mexican government

you clearly dont even understand the ideology you are fighting for

Compare them now with what they had a thousand years ago and you will see a fall into anarchy.

and dont understand the arguments you are making in defense of it

He's not an anarchist @Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦

He's trying to give me an example of one

no, he's a retard

@Harrybaxter♫♫♩♫‿◦ Yes, I am not.

I'm actually an Absolute progressivist.

I put PROGRESS as the highest goal of society.

> Compare them now with what they had a thousand years ago and you will see a fall into anarchy.

They aren't an anarchy though

And anarchy just retrds societies.

yeah its really not anarchy at all

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Progressives are just as bad

it is a smaller society, but it is still very much a society