Oh they would.

And therefore

Less work

This conversation is totally of the rails

better welfare can be two meals a day instead of one

If all of them were fit they could overwhelm their overseers.

and less sleep

A reminder that this began as a bad exchange of analogies trying to invalidate slens argument against communism

yes

Of course,
The beaten down slaves could try to resist by deliberately working inefficiently

And all this time i have been trying to bring this conversation back to that topic

And I’m still right.

but we haven't even been able to come to an understanding regarding the morality of owning slaves as a positive argument

But now we’re arguing about how effectively a bunch of emaciated slaves would be able to revolt vs a bunch of fit ones

so how then would you want to move towards the communist ideology when the principles of relation and capital is what it's all about

don't you see this?

Slavery is bad. Free people are more productive anyway.

I wouldnt want to move toward communism at all

Communism is imoral

Like slavery

Nothing is immoral

Oh here we go

Anything damaging to the nation is immoral

I care not for your nihilism leo

well that just shows your lack of understanding of communism, labour and capital.

Fault

Moral relativism*

Communism is therefore immoral.

It is damaging to the nation.

Name one communist country with a happy working class

Or well

One with a working class that wouldnt rather overthrow their government given the chance

So is mass importation of racial aliens

You’ll here no disagreement from me Leo.

Let me ask for the final time, have you read Kapital

Mass immigration isnt a byproduct of capitalism

Baste

Fault if your argument relies on a single bool

It's a byproduct of neoliberal economics

Look at our governments response to corona

Money over welfare, now and forever