Message from @Samaritan™
Discord ID: 689489372953051163
No that's what you're discussing.
Individually
Nobody else is discussing it, as I said, you're autistic.
" the word is used more broadly to refer to behavior that benefits others, regardless of its motive"
what's your actual point then
that you disagree with said source's preamble?
???
Dude
Are you legitimately retarded?
Plato was a pedophile anyways. Basically unless plhad has a basement full of little boys that he stuffs on the regular he's just an autistic poser
I didn't say I agree with the info of that link, I am trying to explain to you why discussing altruism isn't semantics
Now kill that strawman, bury it, and face me
Coward
Even Eden has disavowed that the conversation was about altruism as philosophy
It was just you furiously masturbating you peabrain
Altruism is a giant ass school of philosophy
Lmao
Which again, going on about shit nobody cares about and then getting bent out of shape when people don't want to engage it is a Hallmark of autistic behavior
It is a word
disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others.
That statement has way more meaning than you think
With great understanding comes little passions.
It is a word
Christ
I wasnt arguing a dictionary definition
And would never
I fucking hate semantics
Is this guy really putting the definition ahead of reality?
Definitions are inherently flawed
By design
Because that's how English works
No, they are just popularly attributed , the school of philosophy is just the thought exercises around the word.
Arguing them is the epitome of linguistic retardation
You misunderstand the whole basis of philosophy
point is, your source material there has fascinating and insightful philosophical questions such as "does altruism exist" and "does egoism exist" and it concludes that yes, it's alright to care about other people, and yes, sometimes you shouldn't be altruistic. how fucking wonderful. naturally many people have wasted years of study on just this wishy washy semantic bullshit to come to a common sense answer.
Using definitions in arguments is even a fallacy