I'm personally much much more of a fan of QFT and MWI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6FR08VylO4

If people were interested in a private audiobook/ebook library for the Athen's community, I could add his books to it 🙂

But so far, no responses...

true, M-Theory and a few others had a similar idea.

Cosmological constant...

yeah, mathematicians refusal to admit their postulates are missing a few
partial differentials

Well, theoretical physicists anyway

meh, i doubt very many are capable of remembering what their terms mean once they start down the road of running the numbers

He's well spoken

Electrons are waves, hmm

otherwise, they wouldn't make such regular claims that contradicted their fundamental assertions

well, you can apply statistical analysis to any relationship described by analog calculus

just an approximation

One of my favorite ideas in all of physics is the Single Electron Universe

hmm, not sure I'm familiar with that one

"It looks like the way electrons behave in their wavefunctions is different when you're not looking at them versus when you are looking at them"

Spooky

@OneTrueGod That's what I was talking about before.

Creepy huh

Hugh Everett proposed that we were overly complicating things.

OR.. "Given the scale, it looks like we can't make measurements or observations without disturbing that which we wish to evaluate"

That there is no observation step. There is only entanglement.

Not quite

The double split experiment has methods of measuring that do not interfere directly

always curious why more people only consider higher dimensions rather than lower dimensions

yet the electrons still act the same way

https://i.imgur.com/bkZ88HG.png

any measurment or observation effecting the initial state of a system will result in an altered end state

That's not possible though

explain what you mean by this. not possible... per the current paradigm.. which we know to be inaccurate

Firstly, you would have to describe how a measurement effects an electron in such a specific way despite different types of measurement

You ought to think about observation in terms of entanglement rather than classical interaction

actually, given the contradictions revealed by the double slit experiment, if you resume the conventions that apply in any other field, the burden of proof would be on you to prove definatively that it is impossible for such an interaction to occur

it's only the shift in convention that changes the burden of proof

Won't be answered until we have a way of observing an electron without interfering with it, like firing them through a hole into a screen that registers it

true

Want to know what's even creepier?

seems to indicate that our reality is the result of the 'alignment' of lower dimensions

hence why the electron 'waves' in and out of existance

Setting up a means of visually recording the electron as it passes through the hole seems to make it act as a single particle