Message from @ldlework

Discord ID: 686254247066468414


2020-03-08 16:46:04 UTC  

*mind splode*

2020-03-08 16:46:05 UTC  

so it's a feedback

2020-03-08 16:46:13 UTC  

think about the entangled electrons at a distance

2020-03-08 16:46:21 UTC  

there's absolutely *nothing spookky* going on

2020-03-08 16:46:35 UTC  

when you consider that the fields that make up the properties of particles in the universe have arbitrary mappings

2020-03-08 16:46:40 UTC  

well not arbitrary, but functional mappings

2020-03-08 16:47:07 UTC  

that seems more intuitive to me that the 3d visualization which i never agreed with

2020-03-08 16:47:17 UTC  

if you think of an electron as composed as activity across *multiple* fields which are arbitrarily mapped

2020-03-08 16:47:43 UTC  

then why can't the electrons "exist" in the field which defines their spin, near each other, and hence have high entanglement

2020-03-08 16:47:53 UTC  

while all their other properties defined on other fields are non-local?

2020-03-08 16:47:54 UTC  

arbitrarily mapped? you mean conistently mapped

2020-03-08 16:47:58 UTC  

functionally mapped

2020-03-08 16:48:04 UTC  

so yeah, consistently based on some function

2020-03-08 16:48:07 UTC  

that works too

2020-03-08 16:48:14 UTC  

that's fucking crazy to me

2020-03-08 16:48:27 UTC  

once you open that door, then there could be all sorts of crazy non-intuitive phenomena possible

2020-03-08 16:48:43 UTC  

also, it really helps me understand spacetime as emergent

2020-03-08 16:48:51 UTC  

there is no such thing as "spacetime"

2020-03-08 16:49:09 UTC  

spacetime is just the locality relationships between field mappings

2020-03-08 16:49:21 UTC  

funny thing is that is AI 101

2020-03-08 16:49:22 UTC  

which usually are coherent across fields, but sometimes not!

2020-03-08 16:49:49 UTC  

by coherent I mean, all parts of some particle or system are either all entangled, or not

2020-03-08 16:49:52 UTC  

functions programming vs procedural

2020-03-08 16:50:20 UTC  

it's so crazy to think of entanglement -> geometry

2020-03-08 16:50:33 UTC  

rather than things in geometry being close to each other being more causally related

2020-03-08 16:50:45 UTC  

amazing actually. cause i have been working on expressing something very similar for years

2020-03-08 16:50:52 UTC  

it can help one understand a reality which is not physical at all

2020-03-08 16:50:58 UTC  

and then our perception is just that

2020-03-08 16:51:02 UTC  

you are describing the sierpinki fractal

2020-03-08 16:51:09 UTC  

well still physical

2020-03-08 16:51:10 UTC  

almost exactly

2020-03-08 16:51:13 UTC  

but just like... a different take

2020-03-08 16:51:47 UTC  

we're interpreting stable relations rather than actual volumetric space, filled with marbles, etc

2020-03-08 16:51:51 UTC  

choke on it MA

2020-03-08 16:51:51 UTC  

well, that is really a function of vocabulary and definition than the math

2020-03-08 16:51:55 UTC  

yeah

2020-03-08 16:52:05 UTC  

and just intuitive perception and language

2020-03-08 16:52:21 UTC  

our brain just processes electrical signals anyway

2020-03-08 16:52:25 UTC  

what i'm getting at is more of a universe of information that manifests as a spacetime with marbles

2020-03-08 16:52:29 UTC  

exactly

2020-03-08 16:52:46 UTC  

you have an arm, but you also have a schema of an arm