Message from @Malt_Hitman

Discord ID: 514308245133721601


2018-11-20 05:15:38 UTC  

But that's besides the point

2018-11-20 05:15:44 UTC  

Hey, Tim is online. First time I have seen when he isn't idle

2018-11-20 05:15:45 UTC  

It was just an example

2018-11-20 05:15:51 UTC  

Seems to be a law respecting an establishment of religion, specifically prohibiting its free expression thereof.

2018-11-20 05:15:56 UTC  

But just because something is illegal at the Federal level doesn't mean that law is going to be enforced.

2018-11-20 05:16:02 UTC  

and actually, also abridging the freedom of speech

2018-11-20 05:16:16 UTC  

@Malt_Hitman they can though

2018-11-20 05:16:24 UTC  

What are we arguing about? I'm sure I'll have extremely aggressive views on it and I'll use those views to bash on this communist @Gilgamesh

2018-11-20 05:16:24 UTC  

Yes, they could.

2018-11-20 05:16:32 UTC  

Well I guess I believe in human sacrifice as my religion

2018-11-20 05:16:38 UTC  

Government cant stop me

2018-11-20 05:16:46 UTC  

@DrWittMDPhD don't ask me. It's something to do with scotus

2018-11-20 05:16:47 UTC  

it seems like, from the perspective of the constitution, a law literally respecting an establishment of Islamic religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof....

2018-11-20 05:16:50 UTC  

you get what I'm saying

2018-11-20 05:16:52 UTC  

But again its besides the point

2018-11-20 05:16:59 UTC  

now, if there's some non-speech, non-expression content of that law

2018-11-20 05:17:04 UTC  

like a disturbance of the peace

2018-11-20 05:17:08 UTC  

@Cody think about what I said about new york though. That the state passed a law making it illegal to bathe with a duck (real law). They were allowed to do that because it didn't trample the constitution or try to supercede federal law

2018-11-20 05:17:09 UTC  

a form of violence

2018-11-20 05:17:18 UTC  

maybe there are civil suits for amplified playing of the call to prayer

2018-11-20 05:17:21 UTC  

Deep down, I think this is some type of secret code debating the gayness of traps.

2018-11-20 05:17:28 UTC  

Loud broadcasting of muzzie throat chanting is a disturbance of the epace

2018-11-20 05:17:29 UTC  
2018-11-20 05:17:30 UTC  

I'm saying that becuase the SCOTUS decided it was unconstitutional, it is now illegal for everyone

2018-11-20 05:17:44 UTC  

all 3 branches enforce that law to make it illegal to do so

2018-11-20 05:17:44 UTC  

My feelings are that Codes is clearly on the 'not gay' side of the issue.

2018-11-20 05:17:46 UTC  

@DrWittMDPhD go home, you're drunk

2018-11-20 05:17:49 UTC  

but as for preventing the expression, especially of a particular religion...

2018-11-20 05:17:54 UTC  

Alcohol is degenerate

2018-11-20 05:17:56 UTC  

I think you'd have a hard time arguing the constitutionality of that

2018-11-20 05:18:07 UTC  

@DrWittMDPhD 😂

2018-11-20 05:18:15 UTC  

you could find some room in restricting the specific way in which it is expressed

2018-11-20 05:18:19 UTC  

what was going on here? just joined and i have no idea whats currently going on

2018-11-20 05:18:19 UTC  

because it has some non-speech effect

2018-11-20 05:18:22 UTC  

non-expressive effect

2018-11-20 05:18:23 UTC  

there are workarounds though like noise ordanances

2018-11-20 05:18:25 UTC  

Man your worse than my friend

2018-11-20 05:18:25 UTC  

etc.

2018-11-20 05:18:31 UTC  

worse in what way

2018-11-20 05:18:39 UTC  

@Pyro reminds me of when Donnie is asking what s going on in Big Lebowski

2018-11-20 05:18:49 UTC  

you can't tell them to not broadcast a prayer, you CAN say that it cannot disturb the peace. There are workarounds plenty