No nothing November

if judges cannot say one thing is unconstitutional then they cannot say ANYTHING is

How about No Vember

@Cody they agree, but the law needs to be drafted in a way which gives them that opportunity

@DrWittMDPhD the fuck is a Vember

But with judicial review, they can make anything illegal by saying its unconstitutional

It's short for November

the law must not prohibit the expression, nor respect a specific establishment

Which is not apart of the constitution

Loook

Fucker

the law must concern making loud advertisements

of any sort

My example was just that

An example

Apparently Vember means adrenaline rush

Dont think so hard on it

Uh that's a real word?

God

those are activist judges that are willing to sacrifice their careers on the hopes that they won't get impeached by an impotent congrass

actually from what i see xorgy is right

without a permit you are disturbing the peace

@DrWittMDPhD urban dictionary word

@Cody "Let's imagine I'm the state of Ohio, of people want to make it illegal for mosques to play prayers, it gets challenged, goes to the scotus and then they decide that I cant legislate that"

Oh, not real

not a problem with the judicial, seems an issue with the congress

it seems like your law specifically respects an establishment of religion, prohibits its expression, and abridges the freedom of speech

@DrWittMDPhD it is real just not really real

Omg

Your an idiot

if you prohibit the expression, you have a problem

what you need is a noise ordinance

Firstly, a religion can not hamper another person in anyway

not a religious crackedown

@Cody let's not use idiot after "your"

Secondly, the example was just that

well, RFRA was passed by your favourite: elected officials.

An example

RFRA?

it is harder than ever to do anything respecting a specific religion

@Pyro Religious Freedom Restoration Act