Message from @Pyro
Discord ID: 514309348512497675
oh that would be a nightmare
literally the worst idea ever
yup
And I agree
Elections for SCOTUS should only be held in my house.
then why are you complaining that they are unelected?
Let me decide who gets to be a judge
So what do we do to resolve the issue?
absolutely nothing
they are appointed, it is a good middle ground
this is basically the best we got at the moment
this is literally the best there can be
Oh idk make is so that they cant just decided on a case and make it unconstitutional
Can we debate on what November should really be? No Nut November, No Shave November, or what
if they cannot do that, they cannot rule on anything
Both are gay
@Gilgamesh no nut, no shave, no nothing
It needs to be decided on a case by case basis, and not extend beyond the scope of the original case
The idea that a position that's elected is better over an appointed position is an ideological one.
No nothing November
if judges cannot say one thing is unconstitutional then they cannot say ANYTHING is
How about No Vember
@Cody they agree, but the law needs to be drafted in a way which gives them that opportunity
@DrWittMDPhD the fuck is a Vember
But with judicial review, they can make anything illegal by saying its unconstitutional
It's short for November
the law must not prohibit the expression, nor respect a specific establishment
Which is not apart of the constitution
Loook
Fucker
the law must concern making loud advertisements
of any sort
My example was just that
An example
Apparently Vember means adrenaline rush
Dont think so hard on it
Uh that's a real word?
God
those are activist judges that are willing to sacrifice their careers on the hopes that they won't get impeached by an impotent congrass