Message from @Pyro
Discord ID: 514308771376398339
My feelings are that Codes is clearly on the 'not gay' side of the issue.
@DrWittMDPhD go home, you're drunk
but as for preventing the expression, especially of a particular religion...
Alcohol is degenerate
I think you'd have a hard time arguing the constitutionality of that
@DrWittMDPhD 😂
you could find some room in restricting the specific way in which it is expressed
what was going on here? just joined and i have no idea whats currently going on
because it has some non-speech effect
non-expressive effect
there are workarounds though like noise ordanances
Man your worse than my friend
etc.
worse in what way
@Pyro reminds me of when Donnie is asking what s going on in Big Lebowski
you can't tell them to not broadcast a prayer, you CAN say that it cannot disturb the peace. There are workarounds plenty
You have dodged my entire example
never saw the big lebowski
God dammit Donnie
It's good
I read your example in full, and gave a detailed explanation of the court's position on it, the constitution's position on it, and the possible ways to make the argument which the supreme court would be able to defend.
Whether it is unconstitutional or not is irrelevant, the scotus decided that it was
9 people who are unelected
These fucking fascists wanna chop off my johnson
nine people appointed periodically by elected officials
unelected is better...
yeah, elections for supreme court judges would be...
gruesome
the law would not survive even one fucking election cycle
it would be a clusterfuck of lobbyists
oh that would be a nightmare
literally the worst idea ever
yup
And I agree
Elections for SCOTUS should only be held in my house.
then why are you complaining that they are unelected?
Let me decide who gets to be a judge
So what do we do to resolve the issue?
absolutely nothing
they are appointed, it is a good middle ground