Message from @Pyro
Discord ID: 514311258833420288
you're mad that the supreme court took your law which is obviously in contravention of the first amendment to the constitution, and said "hey, this looks to be contravening the constitution"
Calm down, fellas
<#463068752725016579>
I think that if law is written, surely it at least is law.
anyway
No I'm done
lol
Either your trolling, dodging my arguement or both
Round 2 coming later
how you gonna get upset when you talk about your muslim-specific law being thrown out for respecting an establishment of religion
Or discussion 2
That was not the point of the fucking example
tell me the supreme court is writing law out of thin air
My virtual shekel monies would be on xorgy for round 2.
when they're literally interpreting the first amendment
Ignore the fucking amendments
you should've made a better exmaple
God
> ignore the amendments
Chill
what about the second?
fifteenth?
wouldnt a better example be talking about plessy v ferguson?
I guess someone actually gets what I'm talking about
Or maybe roe v wade
im just giving you the benefit of the doubt
indeed
I know exactly what you're talking about
I just don't agree that the supreme court is manufacturing law out of thin air
Can I get a summary to catch up
@xorgy freedom of religon is in far more then just the 1st amendent as well. It's in the declaration of indepence as well
and you think that, but your example was an excellent example of straightforward constitutional law
Or any number of cases where the scotus decided it was unconstitutional even though the constitution never specifically says so
involving no particularly difficult arguments
same, i never got that summary earlier
Wait. It would be good for both sides to summarize their points
Besides even if judicial review was in the constitution
@Misomania yeah, I chose the 1st because it also has two other clauses relevant to the example
It's still too much fucking power for 9 unelected officials
Luckily it's not and can be curb stomped