Message from @Misomania

Discord ID: 521582417178525706


2018-12-10 06:57:37 UTC  

How si

2018-12-10 06:57:44 UTC  

Or are you fucking around

2018-12-10 06:57:50 UTC  

i'm fucking around

2018-12-10 06:57:56 UTC  

Okay

2018-12-10 06:58:03 UTC  

but really how else would you take him down

2018-12-10 06:58:12 UTC  

With arguments?

2018-12-10 06:58:19 UTC  

who listens to those

2018-12-10 06:58:34 UTC  

Right, no one has time to use logic

2018-12-10 06:59:10 UTC  

logic is scary to people though

2018-12-10 06:59:12 UTC  

SJWs are a false flag so you will give the government more power to bring companies into line Hitler/Mussolini-style :^)

2018-12-10 06:59:31 UTC  

Basically you have the major media corp that chooses the talking points. Then Jones misrepresents theories that are gaining traffic. Then the news only talks about his misrepresentations.

2018-12-10 06:59:45 UTC  

Easy

2018-12-10 06:59:55 UTC  

This is not even professional level shit

2018-12-10 07:00:11 UTC  

A lot of those theories had fucking nothing to them

2018-12-10 07:00:44 UTC  

it's the same old problem of sorting bad intent from stupidity, you need positive evidence for that

2018-12-10 07:00:47 UTC  

2 shooters tier garbage

2018-12-10 07:01:34 UTC  

The point if misrepresentation sometime is to represent known bad Intel mostly ,then represent known good Intel sometimes

2018-12-10 07:01:39 UTC  

appeal to guilt by association doesn't cut it, you need private recordings of meetings or some shit

2018-12-10 07:01:46 UTC  

Then they just reference the bad Intel and it muddied it all

2018-12-10 07:01:46 UTC  

@NativeInterface that is assuming you can tell the difference and that you don't err and think that they can't both be true

2018-12-10 07:02:18 UTC  

someone can be stupid and of bad intent

2018-12-10 07:02:47 UTC  

For example Jones said 9/11 was an inside job. Then he said chems are turning frogs gay.

2018-12-10 07:02:53 UTC  

but we're not accusing alex of being stupid, we're accusing of bad intent, and we need evidence for that part, since obviously we dont really care if he's just stupid

2018-12-10 07:03:17 UTC  

I assume he is not stupid to be where he is at.

2018-12-10 07:03:34 UTC  

Harvard said 9 out of 10 high level individuals are sociopaths.

2018-12-10 07:03:50 UTC  

They'd sooner you believe them to be incompetent

2018-12-10 07:03:58 UTC  

to a fanatic, everything that opposes their cult is of bad intent inherently and there is no way to disprove that to them

2018-12-10 07:04:16 UTC  

True but who is the fanatic

2018-12-10 07:04:35 UTC  

they indentify as their tribe, so anything that opposes that tribe is seen as a mortal enemy and a threat to their very being

2018-12-10 07:04:50 UTC  

I always assume people to be more competent, and that they only use incompetence as an excuse

2018-12-10 07:05:00 UTC  

yeah the irs is my mortal enemy

2018-12-10 07:05:37 UTC  

in my religious cult we have a right to the fruits of our labor

2018-12-10 07:05:50 UTC  

When someone seems to have botched numbers, is it to achieve an end or did their boss put them in that position because they suck cock well?

2018-12-10 07:06:19 UTC  

I think it is much more likely to achieve an end result

2018-12-10 07:06:28 UTC  

you're quite optimistic about humanity and competence then

2018-12-10 07:06:33 UTC  

thats cool

2018-12-10 07:06:54 UTC  

For example, the Iraq war was founded on WMDs but then later they said they couldn't find any when they KNEW they had em previously

2018-12-10 07:07:02 UTC  

No

2018-12-10 07:07:10 UTC  

High ranking humans pretend to be dumb

2018-12-10 07:07:12 UTC  

well, we gave them the weapons so...

2018-12-10 07:07:13 UTC  

That is my point