if the sender purposely tried to harm someone

that's not free speech

That's the rub

I don't see it

what your'e trying to say

on the other hand people with seizures shouldnt allow GIFs

so it's the guys fault

that's like yelling in someones ears through a bullhorn

i can see peopel posting it because it's funny too

assuming the guy had gifs off

and all seizures ppl should have Gifs OFf

they just too stupid to do it

Hmm not entirely invalid point graylan, but, blacklisting gifs could certainly be bypassed in a targeted effort

no in browser

says " disable images"

Yeah, on browser, or OS globally

if he cant view all images without knowing disable them.

anyway, there's no story here

re:free speech

it was an attack

Encoding url , obfuscating file types or code could plausibly bypass image disabling

the sender knew he had eppileppsy

But, some ppl woold say its merely communication

@LotheronPrime but why cant people post things like that to twitter

i should be able to do that, they should remove GIfs

that's why steem is ideal.. they cant delete the blocks.

twitter just wipe your life off the digital earth.

Dont think I follow the steem reference

Steam? The gaming platform ?

blockchain that's immuteable

not gaming

can't delete posts

As far as stealth delivery of blacklisted content, delivery can still he accomplished if one were motivated

yeah

theres no story here.

just so you know

@caykoh the way blockchain works, nothing is blacklisted everything is just there.

its a nice conspiracy discussion, sure, but no story

I disagree. Some.of the penalties being seen on twitter etc. Are attacks

maybe if twitter started using transparent technology we wouldn't have so much manipluation

Not targeting epileptic conditions, , but intent to disrupt or otherwise bludgeon another user through communications