Message from @FireWater

Discord ID: 533128240101982210


2019-01-11 03:39:00 UTC  

small amounts should be decrim, for all drugs

2019-01-11 03:39:03 UTC  

it just cares if you had it, even if you just used it as CBD oil for knee pain

2019-01-11 03:39:06 UTC  

weed full on legalized ofc

2019-01-11 03:39:08 UTC  

If a business doesn’t want you weeded out on the middle of work than That’s fine

2019-01-11 03:39:31 UTC  

i wonder who brings in the drug supply 🤔

2019-01-11 03:39:31 UTC  

its not testing for that

2019-01-11 03:39:35 UTC  

its testing for if you ever used it

2019-01-11 03:39:38 UTC  

MAKES U thunk 🤔

2019-01-11 03:39:44 UTC  

ya, take the legal prescribed drugs that will fuck you up even more, instead.

2019-01-11 03:39:44 UTC  

🍤this shrip right?

2019-01-11 03:39:51 UTC  

if you aren't being a BAD* employee and are weeded out of your mind they are free to fire without a drug test just based off your performance

2019-01-11 03:39:53 UTC  

I highly oppose the legalization of heavy drugs. It’ll only result in them being adopted by multinational corporations and then they’ll convince us that they are healthy for us

2019-01-11 03:40:07 UTC  

They did it in the 19th century with all those heavy drugs

2019-01-11 03:40:08 UTC  

drug test is interveining on your use of it outside of being a psychodelic, as a healing agent, or say just using it lightly on weekends

2019-01-11 03:40:10 UTC  

that has no place

2019-01-11 03:40:15 UTC  

they did early 20th century, it wasn't crazy abused

2019-01-11 03:40:26 UTC  

@Emperor of USA yeah i dont care. you should be free to do it

2019-01-11 03:41:10 UTC  

you dont even have to be getting high AT ALL for weed to come up in drug tests, just using it as a anti-inflammitory

2019-01-11 03:41:13 UTC  

that shit isn't right

2019-01-11 03:41:17 UTC  

Your thoughts?

2019-01-11 03:41:22 UTC  

just like you should be free to have an ICBM with a nuclear payload for defense under the 2nd amendment. It specificly states that its to defend the state, meaning, you should be able to have whatever is neccessary tocounter other states

2019-01-11 03:41:36 UTC  

well yea.. i guess

2019-01-11 03:41:39 UTC  

pretty expensive

2019-01-11 03:41:54 UTC  

I respect you more than liberals who want to do it because they also want a welfare state with that legalization, which is idiotic. But I don’t want our society to be destroyed by drug use

2019-01-11 03:42:16 UTC  

compromise on decrim, and we good

2019-01-11 03:42:16 UTC  

using CBD oil is drug use? or are you talking about heavy drugs?

2019-01-11 03:42:27 UTC  

well it is

2019-01-11 03:42:29 UTC  

it's a drug

2019-01-11 03:42:29 UTC  

The way multinationals control world governments, the world will be an opoided mess with heroine, meth, and other drugs legalized

2019-01-11 03:42:37 UTC  

its drug use in the same way taking vitamin B for energy is

2019-01-11 03:42:45 UTC  

yeah

2019-01-11 03:42:48 UTC  

I agree

2019-01-11 03:43:12 UTC  

draw the line in the sand where you can keep the entire argument consistent

2019-01-11 03:43:20 UTC  

amazonia that hasn't happened in the countries where hard drugs are legal, but im not personally worried about pushign for that

2019-01-11 03:43:40 UTC  

all the hard drugs just became less inticing, use dropped, and illegal sales by cartels lost their foothold

2019-01-11 03:44:04 UTC  

if decriminalising means we still prosecute dealers it doesnt solve much as it still doesnt gurantee a clean supply

2019-01-11 03:44:32 UTC  

prosecute dealers is not the same as prosecute manufacturing

2019-01-11 03:45:18 UTC  

well i guess. But the manufacturers have to ship their product somehow, if its directly they are the dealers

2019-01-11 03:45:55 UTC  

i mean i could easily manufacture all illicit drugs myself, not really feasable for just yourself though, not at all costeffective

2019-01-11 03:46:05 UTC  

so dealers should have a way to trace it back to where it was produced. and then if if the synthesis process is bad, they should be held accountable.