Message from KirstenLauryn in Anticom #general

2017-08-02 03:01:10 UTC  

Takes stupid people out of the gene pool

2017-08-02 03:04:58 UTC  

@Haupstürmfuhrer Pepe can you pls vet me I just spent 2 hours in a voice call with you on that one server

2017-08-02 03:21:56 UTC  

Go into settings and turn off sound

2017-08-02 03:22:01 UTC  

It' only a number

2017-08-02 03:22:22 UTC  

>Birth control should be mandatory for anyone on benefits

2017-08-02 03:22:25 UTC  

Or you could not have benefits

2017-08-02 03:22:31 UTC  

oy vey

2017-08-02 03:23:07 UTC  

Lmao yeah I'm the Jew because I don't want my money going to subsidise low IQ subhumans

2017-08-02 03:23:20 UTC  

Go crawl back under your NEETcave you pay for with your NEETbux

2017-08-02 03:23:58 UTC  

Birth control is immoral imo. But yeah we shouldn't have benefits tbh

2017-08-02 03:24:27 UTC  

There's this thing called not having sex, 100% birth control

2017-08-02 03:24:47 UTC  

If you're having dozens of bastard children maybe you should rethink your life instead

2017-08-02 03:25:03 UTC  

I believe in marriage first

2017-08-02 03:25:06 UTC  

Birth control also has negative side effects

2017-08-02 03:25:22 UTC  

I'm a firm believer in shotgun marriage

2017-08-02 03:25:27 UTC  

I know I'm doing research for a video on it

2017-08-02 03:25:28 UTC  

If someone makes a big mistake they should suffer for it

2017-08-02 03:25:41 UTC  


2017-08-02 03:25:49 UTC  

Yeah they shouldn't make the mistake to begin with

2017-08-02 03:25:59 UTC

2017-08-02 03:26:08 UTC  

Roe effect

2017-08-02 03:26:34 UTC  

Never heard of the Roe effect, thanks for posting it, but it makes sense

2017-08-02 03:27:08 UTC  

It's common sense when you observe the world, people inherit their views, which is why arabia has been muslim for over a thousand years

2017-08-02 03:27:30 UTC  

It's basically about gene pool and stuff

2017-08-02 03:29:16 UTC  

I understand that abortion can have benefits in society but I don't think it's justified on those benefits

2017-08-02 03:29:30 UTC  

The argument given is minority birth rates, but it's still taking the life of a child

2017-08-02 03:29:45 UTC  

There's a difference between active and passive eugenics

2017-08-02 03:30:46 UTC  

Passive eugenics I think are Involuntary. I.e people with a lower IQ make poor decisions

2017-08-02 03:31:01 UTC  


2017-08-02 03:31:14 UTC  

Active eugenics is if you kill people below a certain iq or something

2017-08-02 03:31:18 UTC  

Sterilisation involuntarily

2017-08-02 03:31:28 UTC  

Passive is where you create conditions where you're technically not doing anything immoral

2017-08-02 03:31:56 UTC  

Wild animals in natural selection is a sort of passive eugenics

2017-08-02 03:32:02 UTC  

Smarter animals are more successful, yada yada

2017-08-02 03:32:11 UTC  

The people that put themselves in those situations are not furthering their own race

2017-08-02 03:32:59 UTC  


2017-08-02 03:33:05 UTC  

Not even race

2017-08-02 03:33:18 UTC  

If someone can't even further themselves they're useless to themselves, let alone their family or settlement

2017-08-02 03:34:10 UTC  

A good example of passive eugenics is Hong Kong

2017-08-02 03:34:36 UTC  

Through a highly competitive society they've gone from an uninhabited rock in the sea to the best port on earth bar maybe singapore or suez

2017-08-02 03:36:39 UTC  

Yeah that's right