Message from @EndangeredProdigy

Discord ID: 535711442716852225


2019-01-18 06:40:58 UTC  

I do think a country that has nukes would use them to win a war

2019-01-18 06:41:03 UTC  

If they were about to be overrun

2019-01-18 06:41:12 UTC  

they wouldn't win it though

2019-01-18 06:41:15 UTC  

have you ever wondered why electronics MUST accept all harmful interference?

2019-01-18 06:41:16 UTC  

because of the global alliances

2019-01-18 06:41:28 UTC  

they would have to nuke multiple countries to ruin

2019-01-18 06:41:34 UTC  

in order to not be nuked back

2019-01-18 06:41:37 UTC  

why we don't make shielded electronics?

2019-01-18 06:41:45 UTC  

Doesn’t matter; when a leader of a country has execution in his future he’ll do anything

2019-01-18 06:42:10 UTC  

they once discussed the US nuking itself to shut down electronics in an area via electromagnetic waves

2019-01-18 06:42:10 UTC  

that's why it takes more than one person to authorize a nuke

2019-01-18 06:42:33 UTC  

if the president were able to just send nukes willy nilly, that would be hazardous

2019-01-18 06:42:42 UTC  

there have to be power checks

2019-01-18 06:42:46 UTC  

How do nukes work?

2019-01-18 06:42:52 UTC  

you have a chain of command

2019-01-18 06:42:53 UTC  

I thought the president did control the nukes

2019-01-18 06:43:18 UTC  

Only the President can direct the use of nuclear weapons by U.S. armed forces, through plans like OPLAN 8010-12. While the President does have unilateral authority as commander-in-chief to order that nuclear weapons be used for any reason at any time, the actual procedures and technical systems in place for authorizing the execution of a launch order require a secondary confirmation under a two-man rule, as the President's order is subject to secondary confirmation by the Secretary of Defense.[citation needed] If the Secretary of Defense does not concur, then the President may in his sole discretion fire the Secretary. The Secretary of Defense has legal authority to approve the order, but cannot veto it.

2019-01-18 06:43:23 UTC  

that's a quote from wikipedia

2019-01-18 06:44:18 UTC  

that's a graphic

2019-01-18 06:46:00 UTC  

not sure how they work in other countries though

2019-01-18 06:46:05 UTC  

I'm sure it's similar

2019-01-18 06:47:05 UTC  

Yeah that makes sense

2019-01-18 06:47:36 UTC  

it's not impossible to use them, but it is enough to prevent abuse of power

2019-01-18 06:47:51 UTC  

Apple is the devil

2019-01-18 06:47:57 UTC  

I've come to the conclusion

2019-01-18 06:48:12 UTC  

h2b? yes

2019-01-18 06:48:39 UTC  

all tech companies essentialy use slave labor via h2b

2019-01-18 06:48:54 UTC  

I’d say something about apple

2019-01-18 06:48:57 UTC  

But I have one

2019-01-18 06:49:00 UTC  

all companies essentially use slave labor if they are globalized

2019-01-18 06:49:02 UTC  

So <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

2019-01-18 06:49:48 UTC  

companies abuse lax regulations in less developed countries to cut costs. It's the only way to compete in the global market

2019-01-18 06:50:00 UTC  

apple using sweatshop labour in America say it aint so!!

2019-01-18 06:50:18 UTC  

urgh, only 360p right now

2019-01-18 06:50:27 UTC  

they are remaking slave plantations inside the US for the corporations

2019-01-18 06:51:12 UTC  

think of how bad it will be in california when the corporation owns everything you need to survive and keeps you in lifelong debt

2019-01-18 06:51:20 UTC  

@Misomania omg like corporate towns or somthing?

2019-01-18 06:51:34 UTC  

you mean like it is now @Misomania

2019-01-18 06:51:53 UTC  

yep. Rent is to high so they own all places to live, all places that sell food, all transportation , all communication