so he covered it in video

i already said imo they base it on % of fake news vs legit news rather than how much big propaganda they throw

did he look at how damn biased it is and by whom it is made? @⛧アシュトン⛧ it's just giving mainstream liberal outlets 5/5 (even they don't know why apparently, with numerous edits and opinion pages getting flagged) while all conservative sites are getting 1/5 so far @⛧アシュトン⛧

for me every news that pulled gamers are dead is fake news ;P

The media is just one industry that can pledge allegiance to whatever state...

Just use newsguard

not all ?

That's the best one

fox is having good rating there ?

It's not important that it's the industry a true fascist state would target first

there is a lot of shitty conservative sites so i'm not surprised

no, just sites like CNN get a good rating

umm edge is using newsguard ?

it is soon

they are testing it in the insider track

point is a lot of conservative mainstream news sites

aim for baby boomer

who are less inteligent and more likely to bite bullshit

and they want confirmation bias

so a lot of conservative / right wing sites produce more bullshit

is a "real" or "old fashionned" fascist state even possible in today's information age ?

as such a lot of them are getting fake news there 😛

oin the other hand a lot of lib sites manipulate the real news

to make it seem the way they like

as such they often publish truth but manipulated, in overall they get way more technically correct news

even if it is propaganda

that said to me it's more dangerous cause when they do throw some fake news it has more legitimacy with it

CNN gets 5 out of 5 stars for being trustworthy... on their coverage of covington from newsguard

and imo newsguard should give some shit stars for everytime that happens even if overall is good

daily mail's site is at 1 out of 5

it rates websites not articles afaik

so cnn deserves a perfect score?

so for example they take majority of cnn news that's availible

and compare amount of fake news vs legit news

nah im o majority of those sites don't deserve perfect score

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/01/11/new-app-newsguard-promises-to-stop-fake-news-have-a-look-at-who-owns-funds-it/

just pointing out it's the way they're scored is the reason one is good other is bad

isn't newsguard about accountability too ? if cnn makes some fake news but is relatively quick to redact and make an apology i think it's fair

to me the app is usesless cause all it says 'this site is utter shit' as if you couldn't see it yourself

they've been doubling down on the buzzfeed and covington stories

Yeah, they do it with sneak edits but it does end up ok