Message from @Gilgamesh
Discord ID: 540415307190370304
@Termer and so since it hurts someone who didn't deserve it necessarily it would be wrong
eugenics, killing a few people for the benefits of millions.
evil ? benevolent ?
@Termer If the person you stole from stole from others it is up to the bigger picture anyway
...ya, see how little this makes sesne? That's why I don't believe in evil...lol
True.
got the new humble ps4 bundle... still buying a lot of my games this way https://www.humblebundle.com/games/indie-playstation-bundle-2019
Evil is hard to define universally.
It's easy to do on a smaller scale.
Because people agree on morality.
I agree
No, people do not.
Eugenics is a myth. There is only dysgenics.
Small scale is easier
I mean in smaller settings, people tend to agree.
Even a person doesn't necessarily.
I'd argue that it is illogical to use "the ends justify the means" Because if anyone found out, your end goal just got trumped by their knowledge
However
@Gilgamesh, euthanasia, helping people to die. Evil or not ?
I did talk to a friend last week and there are only two logical routes to take in foreign affairs
a route implies a destination or goal.
@Ranko we also talked about euthanasia. If someone is terminally ill or in constant pain and they want to die, let them take their life or ask for it
your "logical" rhetoric only works as long as there is a binary choice, but crumbles between two bad choices
take the train meme thought experiment
and try to apply your "logic"
find the good solution
Capitalism is eugenics. Statism is dysgenics.
train meme?
this
And?
I call that a fallacy
i would make the cart do a sick drift and take out everyone
It's designed to impose fear of making a choice
What's the goal?
go left hit that reverse then go right 😃
you can't deny that there are times where there is no such things as evil or good, and that no amount of "logic" will make everyone agree