```
2012 Missouri case
In October 2012, after being reported August 2011 by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography", with the U.S. attorney's office for the Western District of Missouri recommending a 3-year prison sentence without parole. The office in conjunction with the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force argued that the "Incest Comics" on Bee's computer "clearly lack any literary, artistic, political or scientific value". Christian Bee was originally indicted for possession of actual child pornography, but that charge was dropped as part of a plea deal, and was instead charged with possession of the "Incest Comics".[95][96][97][98]
```

Count Dankula made a video on loli you guys should check it out

he's inconsistent

Right...

and uses kneejerk emotional arguments

I don't support loli porn at all, but there needs to be a general consensus on it

count dankula is a retard

Count dankula is an edgyboi but his loli video is pretty decent actually

"muh freespeech but no to loli porn"

"it's free speech unless i don't liek it"

```
2008 Iowa case
In October 2008, a 38-year-old Iowa comic collector named Christopher Handley was prosecuted for possession of explicit lolicon manga. The judge ruled that two parts of the PROTECT Act criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" were unconstitutional, but Handley still faced an obscenity charge.[77] Handley was convicted in May 2009 as the result of entering a guilty plea bargain at the recommendation of his lawyer, under the belief that the jury chosen to judge him would not acquit him of the obscenity charges if they were shown the images in question.[89]
```
this person though convicted for obscenity charges

so basically

so is it obscenity or is it child porn?

just steer clear of loli/shota shit

Idiot, Count Dankula said he would support loli in the case it meant real life sexual assaults on kids went down.

that's the question

watching dankula is like listening to the local drunkard and consider him an academic

loli shit especially since girls are involved

there's a reason u dont see little girls being pushed to be made into boys at a young age lol and only see little boys being feminized and drag

there's literally no proof on loli porn even affecting sexual assault just like there's no proof of GTA causing school shootings

well in some of these cases the guys had actual cp as well

so i guess they use that excuse

lack of porn causes more sexual assaults tbh

"probably possess real porn too so ban it"

well school shooters played doom so yeah

aren't most trans ftm ?

Exactly, but it doesn't mean the shit should be normalised because it's still simulated child porn

@Ranko no way

Idk sjws use the normalization argument on entertainment they dont like

"normalized"

oh no, like I said, I don't support loli at all. But there needs to be an agreement on what it is classified as @ĐaddyDank

japan sells loli porn in supermarkets and it has some of the lowest sexual assault rates in the world

@.Not Sean normalization should be used when faggotry was legalized

look at the child sexualiztion that's being normalized now

fetish shit doesn't mean normalization

^

and the after birth abortion shit and 9 month abortion shit after roe v vwade shit was legalized

If the artist states they're over the legal age its fine. Over 18s can have small bodies it happens all the time. If they however state they're underage or they do not say what their age is then we can assume it's simulated child porn

everyone didn't become zoophiliacs in Canada just because it's legal

leftists know nothing BUT slipper slope

there's people eating poop on the internet for sexual pleasure, but you don't see that becoming normal