It isn't a dead correlation

I saw somebody who looked like the Smirking Kid at Taco Bell earlier

@ĐaddyDank lies, you're an irresponsible driver and your license ought to be revoked

you can't defend an idiot who got convicted on hate crimes because of thought crimes and rail on other people for what amounts to be the same, thought crimes

I don't even fucking have a licence

```
In response to Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, Congress passed the PROTECT Act of 2003 (also dubbed the Amber Alert Law) and it was signed into law on April 30, 2003, by President George W. Bush.[68] The PROTECT Act amended the previous law on child pornography by adding an affirmative defense which states that "the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors".[69][70] The PROTECT Act also modified the law by changing the previous "appears to be a minor" section with "indistinguishable from that of a minor" phrasing, and it is specified that "the term 'indistinguishable', used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults."[71][72] The PROTECT Act also enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is "obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ... sexual intercourse ... and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". By its own terms, the law does not make all simulated child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. And mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the internet, or transported across state lines.[73]
```

Gay

basically it's legal

unless it's sexual in any little way

you don't go searching for pictures of children in sexual positions unless you have some sort of desire to look at children that way

then you drove without one, to goulag you go

and posssession isnt illegal

You're using simulations to feed in to someone's desire to fuck kids instead of digging that desire out

BUT

if u got it a certain way

thru internet

or mail

The problem is psychological

imo

or etc common carrier

I've never driven a car in my life apart from when I was 4 on private land with my father.

@Ranko

driving in video games without a licence is bad either way

You don't need a license in Forza mate

```
Currently, such depictions are in a legal grey area due to parts of the PROTECT Act being ruled unconstitutional on a federal level; however, laws regulating lolicon and shotacon differ between states; several states have laws that explicitly prohibit cartoon pornography and similar depictions (such as video games in the state of New Jersey[citation needed]), while others usually have only vague laws on such content; in some states, such as California, such depictions specifically do not fall under state child pornography laws,[78] while the state of Utah explicitly bans it.[79]
```

You basically already have one, because you're driving

Haven't played Forza in ages

two years ago i think

Great game tho

chris christie here banned all loli/shota stuff

I fucking love Forza I'm on it right now in the middle of a Forzathon Live

states can decide how far they want to ban

Nice dude

ban anime when?

ANIME IS NOT LOLI SHIT IN MY ASS

i'd vote to rope all weebs

こんにちは

Nah jk I like Initial D because it has cars in it I hate every other anime

that depends on who you ask

me irl tbh

that's the beauty of thought crime