Again the problem with nothing is that its not sound

@Abel Yeah basically scientists said first there was nothing and then everything happened. Total hogwash

Also thats not what the big bang theory say

@Strufa so You don't believe in nothingness? Now we're getting somewhere

well the reason back then everyone hated the idea of a big bang was because youd have to give the bible creedance that it was right about a form of creation. Before the big bang theory most believed that everything here has always been here

No, they didn't say there was "nothing"

yep cause you want to say "Something cant come from nothing"

@Strufa the big bang theory has been adapted rapidly. It used to say there was once nothing even ten years ago

We just don't know

yet is impossible to descrive nothing

hi

I literally remember quotes saying first there was nothing and then "bang"

And saying that "Big bang morons say something came from nothing" is just retarded

Tim Pool Worlds Best Journalist 👌

It wasn't retarded when they actually said it

the moment you describe nothing you describe something

Stop

so by a sense nothing is impossible

You can't possibly be pulling that bullshit

Of course we have to give a name to things

did yall watch muh gurl Tulsi's campaign launch a couple of hours ago?

yep but you call something nothing

We are literally using a name to refer to nothingness

Hawaiian Juche FTW! 👌

Fuck

go into interstellar space where the number of atoms per cubic centimeter can go as low as 0.1, that's the closest thing to naturally ocuring nothingness

even if wee agree on a definition of something and nothing

Anyone who says nothing is something because we have a name for it is so fucked

No offensr

i could only agree that something cant come from nothing in this universe

They are two different things man

A name and a thing

A name and matter

I cant

Here's the thing, I accept big bang because it is the hypothesis that matches the closest with the verified models in current science

so could the big bang inadvertanly be proof of a form of creationism then?

If there's an alternate theory that does so better, I'd be willing to accept it

You know

i have debated a lot the kalam

so yeah i pretty much know what you are going for

@Archon Not at all, since there is no intelligent design taking place