Most casualties caused by Islamic extremism. Sure I'll believe that with ZERO proof.

@RekItRalph who said most casualties

But the gender spectrum. Naw, I need FULL MATHIMATICAL FORMAL LOGIC TO MAKE SOUND PROOFS

@RekItRalph I think you're drunk

Listen Nerdy. Stop being so combative. A worthwhile debate is not based on persuasion or combative arguments, but on inviting the other to look at the argument.

SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH. HOOK ME UP WITH A BIO LAB

I KNOW BETTER THAN ALL THE SCIENTIST LOL

Hey guys

All caps means they're done

Remember Mumkey

@Rouqen sup dude

hello

Yea, I member mumkey

Lol there's no worthwile debates because I know no amount of info will change your mind

@Rouqen dude did you give up on DBZ?

I like making you feel like your backed into a corner for my amusement

Mumkey fren beat his gf to half death remember that?

And

Usually we can say generic statistics without evidence without shoving an article in chat because we talked about it a month ago with evidence and don't have pea brains, Or we just expect the other side to have a shred of preparedness

fucking drumroll

https://twitter.com/AssBurgerRap/status/1095467655060967429?s=19

@🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞 this

A wiseman can gain knowledge from a fool, but a fool cannot see the knowledge the wiseman holds.

Unindicted

I like you pancakes

Never let me down

And now he denies everything

@Crimsom very wise

I havn't denied anything. I read your stupid article from PT an it didn't say anything about a government conspiricy or whatever

Rouqen did you stop watching Dragon Ball Z?

noep

@Gilgamesh as a journalist you can at least give me one credible source to debunk the gender spectrum

@Rouqen how far are you

I'll wait

Goku is fucking dead again

@Rouqen again..? Are you in the cell saga?

Kek nah

@Rouqen oops

My bad

@Rouqen so where are you

@Gilgamesh I'd like you to read this story. It concerns Johns Hopkins University Hospital and how they refused to do gender reassignment surgery for almost 40 years. Note that the reasons they stopped were based upon actual scientific study. Then note in their decision to resume statements like "strong and unambiguous support of the LGBT community" and "Hopkins’s shift not only reflects the public’s far broader discussion about transgender rights and protections, but also the controversies that the discussion engenders." Do these reasons sound scientific or political. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/long-shadow-cast-by-psychiatrist-on-transgender-issues-finally-recedes-at-johns-hopkins/2017/04/05/e851e56e-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e0c1336b1e8e