No they don’t

The latest version doesn’t have that

And if that's the case we could have

a common understanding of the articles

All the past versions did though, all of them before the backlash

Nope

There wasnt just one mention of it in a first draft

It's the most basic ass test I could have gave imo

It was mention in over three different documents.

Because you guys are willfully ignorant

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5729035/Green-New-Deal-FAQ.pdf

I love watching to see how you step around the facts

im not going to dehumanize you based on you being on the radical left and supporting these things. I dislike that you don't know about covington or the Jussie Smollett hoax

So creative and fascinating

The piece being handed out to media outlets covering all of the different points of the Green New Deal

https://web.archive.org/web/20190207191119/https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/media/blog-posts/green-new-deal-faq

The blogpost which outlined the Green New Deal, the earliest variant of any kind of idea behind the legistlation

All of these include the "Unwillingness to work"

is that the one that planned to rebuild ALL buildings?

and remove all air travel?

Totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out highspeed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary, create affordable public transit available to all, with goal to replace every combustion-engine vehicle

One of the points yes.

also I do agree that communism definitely works in tiny groups that rely on bigger, capitalistic systems

Latest version https://www.gp.org/gnd_full

as tim pool has pointed out and I have noticed irl

I have something where I'm not sure if I trust the new version if the old version was a rackety piece of garbage

It doesnt matter the latest version. I stated for you to prove to me that it wasnt changed due to backlash, but rather due to error. You linked me an article that actually did the opposite if you would have examined it.

it was changed due to backlash cAUSING HER TO REALISE HER ERROR

It was error

so

both right

technically

It's about the person more than the paper sometimes for me

No one noticed until the Daily Wire pointed it out

https://youtu.be/JhOood1gKtY

noone likes the amazon deal being canceled

Then they said “yeah we were dumb”

It wasnt an error. If you push three different documents with same point, but only remove it when people mock you for it, it's due to backlash

Like, If the new one leaves all the old ones crud out, There's still a chance her heart is still set on it

Yeah and said persons will be a comitty of experts soon

Politicians lie sometimes