Message from @IXI
Discord ID: 658586547116834828
despite being entirely inorganic
we create programs through machine learning... where characteristic mutations are allowed to occur within a program to compete against others
with the best being allowed to replicate and mutate for future trials
plus, there is a seemingly linear increase in complexity through the fossil record
not to mention the fact that some infectious agents can form semibiogenically
like prions
which can spontaneously form in protein masses
which, under Pasteur's nomenclature, would be a possibly abiogenic lifeform
note: the increase in complexity in the fr is NOT continuous, rather, it spikes like in a boom/bust cycle
@Citizen Z I hope this gives you some context as for what I am talking about
One is an annoying blood sucker, one is an rabies carrying animal that eats up all of your food. That's how some humans like that?
haha probably yes
bruh
@IXI i suggest you read about something called the "phylogenetic tree"
and i honestly think that image is suppost to be a joke
well since people claim that sharing 98 percent of the DNA with apes means we are apes
so might as well
ok?
more likely that whoever created us decided to have similiarities
sure it does. Its how 23 and me works
why can't we apply the same concept to long term evolution?
because there is no proof that we have a common ancestor
especially when the results are consistent with other data
ever heard of ERVs?
so therefore assuming we have a common ancestor is pointless
"so lets talk about endogenous Retroviruses. When a Retrovirus infects an animal, it injects its RNA into a random location in the genome of whatever cell its attacking. Sometimes this genome is integrated into the animal, and will pass down to the next generation. It is believed that ERVs consist of like 5% of the human genome. The interesting thing is we share a lot of the same ERVs with chimpanzees" - me a while ago
and how does that prove that we have a common ancestor
dang that isnt a very good explanation
i should revise it
i understood what you said
but i dont see how it proves anything
i think like only the first 2 minutes are important
fine ill watch it
well the chances of this happening are impossible
unless we have a common ancestor
so you base it on chance
not evidence