no information there

We don’t observe additions to genetic code in real life.

natural selection is random but it biases

We don't need to the evidence supporting it is huge

Mutations are not additions.

pair natural selection with mutation got get information imparted by natural selection

You need entirely new genes, to say it is new. Not a mutation from an existing gene. Even mainstream doesn’t deny this, but you do.

i deny it

point out the problem

Have fun with that.

Even the pseudoscience people know you’re wrong.

thats why its pseudoscience

Natural selection is pseudoscience.

we disagree

I don’t require your agreement. Good day.

so you are here just to say im wrong and then leave

i can simulate mutation paired with natural selection and i bet i can in fact get results

You require mainstream’s agreement, and you don’t have it.

i dont require it

Heh.

Isent things like the flue a good example of natural selection?

are you going to adress the argument at hand or are you going to keep side tracking to stuff you intentionaly using to anger people out of spite

Me or Derek?

darek

k

The video contained 0 sources anyways. You'd also need to define "information."

Most intelligent design people I've met just use it as a synonym for "complexity."

Exactly. Complex life is certainly impossible to generate on earth

Besides that, what created the generator

I believe In evolution because if god exists then where is he

Or she

Or it

I could ask you the same question. Where does macro evolution exist?

When I know you don’t have any examples in real life. You expect me to believe you based entirely on faith. When all we have in real life are examples of creatures being after their own kind, evolution is pure fantasy. It’s obvious there’s a God.

@sad berd so what created evolution?

The Big Bang

Look at the dog it evolved didn’t it

Have y’all heard of killer bean

Yes yes

Is earth flat