conspiracyking dot com

obv biased source

“Only proof you have there, Derek, even though the pope was tried and convicted in a world court for it? Yeah, I’ll just called that evidence.”

Thanks for trolling me.

what

You never gave the proof that he was convinted so

ok buddy

Nor the argument

derek

are you tripping or something

The article was based on the exclusive interview with Kevin Annett of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State on this week's litigation in the Brussels Common Law Court of Justice.

sounds like a lot of whos and i don't cares

You didn’t even read it.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/International_Tribunal_into_Crimes_of_Church_and_State

Its a one man blog

Of a guy pretending to be a actual court off law

And thats your source

So yes i reject your appeal to this authority seeying as i dont not respect it nor believe it

Five judges and 27 jury members from six countries including the USA, isn’t a one man show.

Sure bud

Okay, troll.

injecting any parts of a dead fetus in immoral

is*

Says the guy who cant find me a trustworthy source for his claims

Do you really need a source for this type of decision?

Wasnt talking to you

Chicken’s idea of trustworthy is CNN.

Lol

As if

Nice red herring tho

Give me a scientific peer reviewed article of earth movement.

Why

Because I already know you can’t.

Has nothing to do with this discussion

If you think information regarding the sexual abuse and murder of children regarding the Vatican is supposed to be front page news, you’re clearly being ignorant on purpose.

are you slim shady because you're rocking the table while we're operating

Im not im just asking for a source that isnt one guy who thinks he is an official court of law while he isnt

Matthew 18:6 is good enough for me 😎