Message from @Chief Rocket Designer
Discord ID: 655157646822735873
It may have started out as a weird competition but it ultimately expanded our knowledge of the Earth and Moon considerably
@Chief Rocket Designer So what is that explaining exactly? All I see is that they started to replace the parts so they wouldn't be able to use it without getting more money
@floridaswamptrash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
This has to do with the missing video tapes not telementary data
Essentially it was destroyed
The technology is also obsolete too but only because so much time has passed since it’s been improve upon
@floridaswamptrash basically but that is how technical innovation works
Like nuclear fission reactors
THEY never had the capability that is why they never went so they faked it
It's kind of bad logic to be like "You know what we're going to do? Even though our budget keeps getting cut we're going to start replacing the technology we have that can take us to the moon even if we don't have the money for it." 🤡
I can't believe people would take this and accept it
They spent that money on the construction of the ISS
lol
Which I think is a better call
Nasa progressing backwards since the 1970s
What a lie to believe in
so then you must concede they never went
No it hasn’t been lol
It has just had significantly less funding
@SpiderLedgic (Cancer) If they wanted to use the tech they could have regardless
@floridaswamptrash going to the moon was not that scientifically useful at that time compared to the cost. LEO research was more efficencnt and probes were getting better
Not if it couldn’t get approved
The whole idea now is that because people believe we went to the moon then is the reason they didn't want to go back
You'd have to prove the moon landing in the first place
It already has been proven
it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon
Just making excuses when there are actual facts of what happened to this day and you just ignore it for what? To hold on to your ball earth. Shitz redic.
😂
@l.caudri Prove it
That’s why it’s exposed, they couldn’t fake it well enough
[21:23] l.caudri: it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon--lololol ffs that is so ridiculous
Modern day orbiters, like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, has taken pictures of the Apollo 11 landing site and it is still relatively undisturbed
the computational power in the 60's to replicate the footage would of been basically impossible with the computers used then
Also it should be known that they left lasers on the Moon too so that is also evidence towards it being true
😂
Mirrors*
Imagine thinking you can make something like 2001: Space Odyssey but can't make something like the moon landing
It would have been extremely simple
You are willfully ignorant so how they overcame the speed differential, Van Allen Belt, Fuel creation, Vacuum implosion etc?
to recreate the lighting and all the shadows, you would of needed millions of lasers which were incredibly expensive at the time, as well as the majority of lasers came in red. It was easier just to actually get to the moon than faking everyting with CGI (as cgi wasnt as powerfull enough like it is today)
Dude