Message from @SpiderLedgic (Cancer)
Discord ID: 655157417851617334
I'll entertain your explanation
@floridaswamptrash The Apollo Space craft requires infrastructure to launch, IBM computers from that era, and all the right materials in the right order will billions of dollars to build this infrastructure let alone the rocket itself. NASA right now is basically the lead of the ISS When it comes to sustaining that platform, we also have a ton of infrastructure and mission probes which also cost millios of dollars. In 1970-1980 we replaced the Apollo Hardware with the updated space shuttle hardware, the space shuttle was mean't to go to LEO only so not the moon. Going back to apollo would not be worth it because we can do everything cheaper with new materials now? Why are we not doing this you ask? We are, but slowly, NASA is preparing for the first launch of the SLS within a year or two I think so. We are going back. However we don't have the 50 billion dollars (adj) we had in 1969. We have about 19 Billion today. So we are doing more than we did in those eras internationally and in deep space and still trying to go to the moon with less money. We did not "destroy" that technology we removed the ability to use it because we replaced it. In the same way you replace your phone, you don't destroy your phone you replace it. That does not mean that your phone has backward compatailty. It does not mean that you should get an older phone when you can just wait and get a better phone.
It is reality that it never happened and you ignore the fact that they have said they never went so you can keep fantasizing and hypothesizing all the while maintaining your delusions. Keep the name calling out of it and attack the info not me because you don't want me to put my sassy pants on.
That’s not it
Or maybe that’s part of it too, but mostly
if it was faked to win the space race, why would the ussr allow the US to do such a thing
Public interest dropped so low that the government responded by also moving onto to other things
Space race is a joke
21:18] l.caudri: if it was faked to win the space race---false premise
It may have started out as a weird competition but it ultimately expanded our knowledge of the Earth and Moon considerably
@Chief Rocket Designer So what is that explaining exactly? All I see is that they started to replace the parts so they wouldn't be able to use it without getting more money
@floridaswamptrash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
This has to do with the missing video tapes not telementary data
Essentially it was destroyed
The technology is also obsolete too but only because so much time has passed since it’s been improve upon
@floridaswamptrash basically but that is how technical innovation works
Like nuclear fission reactors
THEY never had the capability that is why they never went so they faked it
It's kind of bad logic to be like "You know what we're going to do? Even though our budget keeps getting cut we're going to start replacing the technology we have that can take us to the moon even if we don't have the money for it." 🤡
I can't believe people would take this and accept it
lol
Which I think is a better call
Nasa progressing backwards since the 1970s
What a lie to believe in
so then you must concede they never went
No it hasn’t been lol
It has just had significantly less funding
@SpiderLedgic (Cancer) If they wanted to use the tech they could have regardless
@floridaswamptrash going to the moon was not that scientifically useful at that time compared to the cost. LEO research was more efficencnt and probes were getting better
Not if it couldn’t get approved
The whole idea now is that because people believe we went to the moon then is the reason they didn't want to go back
You'd have to prove the moon landing in the first place
It already has been proven
it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon
Just making excuses when there are actual facts of what happened to this day and you just ignore it for what? To hold on to your ball earth. Shitz redic.
😂
@l.caudri Prove it
That’s why it’s exposed, they couldn’t fake it well enough
[21:23] l.caudri: it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon--lololol ffs that is so ridiculous
Modern day orbiters, like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, has taken pictures of the Apollo 11 landing site and it is still relatively undisturbed