yeah? I never said they were particularly good or impartial at it

but just say its Affirming the consequent falacy when we do it

I would agree they often go through large lengths to make the observation fit the hypothesis

there is also this

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/666141585695571968/image0.jpg

No dude why? Lol

Thats one of the sillyest memes ever

it's true on a perfect sphere

no

Doesn't mean much though

They use that all the time when u show them right left curve

his argument is that the horizon should curve

no matter what

Its a bs argument

And compound curve means something else anyway

Oh I thought he was just saying curvature in all directions

he was

X and y axis

So x axis (right left in a pic for example) is not enaugh in the FE narative

Bs argument, i have got it thrown at me in the past, its just a hand wave

i explained it wont apear curved when you are at the surface because the tengent cone is a plane at that point

he just said i have no proof

i kept asking for him to explain why

he just kept saying i have no proof

Yeah so u know what i mean lol

Lul conic sections review

Look up compound curve... its something else anyway

yes

Amd regardles

Right left curve means it cant be flat

Oh well

we ended in a disagreement so when he left i said i guess we end in a stalemate

Derek

Yeah he saw right left pics

he came back and said that that was me talking shit about him

I showed him 1 month ago

🤔

Derek is a good guy tbh but there is no reasoning with him on this matter

I showed him right left curve pics

The same ones posted here yesterday

he also kept trying to shange the subject while insisting he wasnt