So XL XL's claim is wrong

where do you see the sharp decline from 1854 to 1874

30 years is a pretty significant

Here

number

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deaths-from-smallpox-in-london

Thats the sharp increase and decline in the 1870s

Right side of the graph

No my claim is not wrong

You sure bout that

Im talking about the worlwide

@kylie where? all i see is a sharp increase from 1850 to 1880s. are you lying again or just blind?

Not a certain country

A sharp increase is a line going directly upwards sir @He Cute

Do you have a world wide graph?

@kylie your stat is also for london, not leicester

They're very close to each other

being deceptive once again

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deaths-from-smallpox-in-london

show how many people were vaccinated in london

Look at 1871

There really isn't one, so you can't prove or disprove my claim

I am @IXI

Doesnt it show how ineffective the vaccine was

@kylie if you can prove nor disprove a claim then it can be dismissed

Guess you better dismiss your anti nasa claims then

Considering its the year with the highest vaccination rates

Yep they didn't do much

But regardless, in the 1900s they did when there was more data collected

I'll talk about that another time if you'd like

@kylie What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence

Indeed

there's no way for you to prove to me that the picture taken by nasa is true

Theres more than one picture sir

neither is there any way for me to disprove that picture is true

except the cgi fails they do sometimes

Then why do you choose not to believe?

like the cloud formations copy paste

why would i believe in something that is not provable?

I agree