what?? why would you post things if you dont think theyre accurate or exact? are you trying to create confusion?

because we dont have 78 million a day

so we do the best we can

so the "best you can" is to post conflicting info and make things more confusing?

we know NASA always lies, an at the top theyre freemasons, so we can discount any nonsense they push as its for their benefit an agenda an not ours

im not talking about what NASA says. this doesnt concern them at all. my issue is that the info posted by flat earthers often conflicting and confusing

Your ignorance is going to have you with cogdiss in a second. lol did you look at what you posted or are you going to regurgitate the same thing we all learned. In order to wake up and understand why we have and issue with what they have said you have to first start with a blank slate and stop believing blindly what you were told. Let me rip apart what that said and what it really means then we will see if you are ready to understand that they get caught in their own lies by the statements they have made. First off tidal look is a phenomena which means it is a special occurrence that breaks all rational and logical rules to be believed by those who subscribe to it. That is where you first go wrong. second off The moon takes 27 days to rotate once and we should see all sides off it if it is spinning so slow that it takes that long to spin. But here again there is another hidden truth to that lie in that it can't be synchronous to us if we spin faster then it. Thirdly You have to ignore the fact that a rotation means just that that something is rotating independently so we should never see one side we should see 27 different frames every night as it rotates. Think okay

it stops us from using the monies to actually investuigate

Some people just need to pick apart what they believe and then that will help them see clearer

"tidal look is a phenomena which means it is a special occurrence that breaks all rational and logical rules to be believed by those who subscribe to it" that is not the definition of a phenomenon

Hell leave believes all together. Phenomena lol like if i put my hand in this fire a phenomena will occur and I won't get burned cause i said so.

what? lol

🤷‍♂️

noun
noun: phenomenon; plural noun: phenomena
1.
a fact or situation that is observed to exist or happen, especially one whose cause or explanation is in question. This means it doesn't happen naturally so saying it occurs is like saying the tooth fairy took my tooth and left me some money

definition of phenomena from merriam webster: plural phenomena : an observable fact or event

[01:05] NS Jones: im not talking about what NASA says. this doesnt concern them at all. my issue is that the info posted by flat earthers often conflicting and confusing

That is in question meaning it is not a constant and can't be proven

why does that mean it doesnt happen naturally

> a fact or situation that is observed to exist or happen, especially one whose cause or explanation is in question.

do you mean that flat earther a contadict fla earther b or a contradicts himself

I feel like natural phenomena are things?

They are observed

Some of their explanations are questioned

Yeah phenomenon is something that occurs that you just use as a scape goat when you can't prove it happens in any other scenario in other words it does not repeat.

@chad46 both

what

I think lightning is a natural phenomenon by that definition

That repeats often

well for a contradict b , we are not borg

lightning is a great example actually

nd for a contradicting themselves everyone does

it is an observable event, but its cause is not clear at first

however, it can be explained

It is not a phenomena it does not meat the criterion it is known repetitive and observable so miss me with that.

ok at this point your definition of phenomena is just incorrect

But it is by the definition you posted

Yes it is known the cause of lightning

@chad46 what is borg

The cause need not necessarily be unknown or debated

What you guys are trying to do is ignore the fact that if something rotates it rotates and the moon doesn't

Notice the 'especially' in your own definition