yes. really big and really flat

Images? 🤔

Where?

12 km of 40.000 is 0.03%.

@DamCore I'd like to see an image of Earth please

https://www.google.com/search?q=blue+marble&rlz=1C1CHBF_deDE791DE791&sxsrf=ACYBGNRXZtwOlOf7CZC0nyhI6zkwEsD8Gg:1575988730437&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfmcrDp6vmAhUvyaYKHUGHA5EQ_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1920&bih=969#imgrc=lJJHWTKAq4NLyM:

all you do, is asking for proof. Then someone presents you proof, and you simply say it's faked

while having no proof of your theory what so ever

like this?

Blue Marble made in Photoshop, wow

and the proof you are presenting, can't be credited because the scale is way too small to be accurate

<:confused:625494374402228244> I haven't done that and I don't think anyone else has done that @DamCore

...

You literally just asked me to show you a picture of the earth

then I did

wow

nice one

and you said its photoshopped

bcs it is

so: you present images of a flat earth and this is considered "proof". Someone else provides images of a circular earth, which you condemn as fake. where is the logic in that?

because...it has to be

Dem, you showed CGI brah

The test was done based on your model's curvature predictions@DamCore

images with random text dont count as proof imo but hey

<:fflushed:604718288458481707>

Alright then

let's just pretend the earth is actually flat

how do you explain the sun and the moon?

they just like memes doc, dont mind it

next?