my evidence, "seismologists"

debate over

I just explained what they did

Providing an abstract doesn’t mean much.

No sorry they do not @shakz7 they are only evidence that our surface that we are on has discharges or on your model tectonic plates that shift. That doesn't prove anything accept that there is some interaction that has built up disturbance that you can feel.

How would P waves curve upward

Diffraction

😄

lol

When they travel through a different medium

You might now know that

That requires a different density medium. These waves are traveling out from not mantle at some point, back THROUGH the crust and would take the same path they were

When waves pass through a boundary of layers it causes them to curve

Like I said

A flearther doesn’t have a mechanism for the waves to continuously curve upward

So you are assuming you know the correct layers

@shakz7 diffraction is spreading out not curving around a ball

Ohhhhh

XD

Its theory

Refraction

lol

<:potatopopcorn_c:651555410762924032>

We know that there’s a layer of much higher density below the crust

Damn well I haven’t do geography for ages

Brb anyways

@shakz7 refraction is deflection none coherent so please come again

The real fun is at vexillology

fantasy worlds beneath the earth

?

I, too, like flags

knowledge of unverifiable things

Anthurium gets it

We can verify the density of lower layers because we can even make seismic waves ourselves. That’s one way we detect nuclear tests

And we know rough origin points of earthwuakes too

that doenst verify anything

What’s the word? Episomething?

diging down is a way to know what is down there

and that surprised those who did it

Wym it doesn’t verify anything? That’s like saying you can’t know that water has a different density from air solely because it refracts light

Idk if I’d say it surprised anyone. We knew it’d get hot and the logistics would get increasingly more and more strained