not for anyone else

because its a good way of providing proper research

and convince others

ok

especially if you are a phd.

no journal would publish such a thing. they are all mainstream

I know how the system works

they dont need to

I was a part of it

you can put it on open access or share it with others

plenty of others have done that already....

Why do you try to find proof of cgi on photos that are assumed cgi?

e.g. https://fecore.org/project/laser-experiment/

like you could share it now and let me read. if it was written well and has sound arguments the dicussion would be settled

Hello

You should do this on photos that are supposed to be real

done

ball is dead

simple ^

the biggest issue i have is that regarding the flat earth topic is that people try to disprove sound scienece with armchair logic and graphics created in ms paint

no. you have it backwards. flat earthers are the scientists. Heliocentrists are the religious ones

the irony

they believe what they were told in school

without questioning

but why cant those flat earth scientists provide solid research?

see above

we don't have an R&D budget

do you not understand that?

you need money to build/buy equipment

NASA spends $55,000,000 per DAY

there are quite cheap ways of settlign this

then do it

NASAs job is not to prove the globe

they are concerned with other things

ok

have a good one

good luck 😉

one questio ntho