We need to see that convexity turn the opposite way.
did u see what i said
120k feet u arent high up enough it still looks flat up there
Most globers throw Neil Degrasse under the bus anyway when confronted with facts.
well that high it shows its flat
so
I know.
the fact it goes convex and concave
so what
its flat
lol
Right, lol.
i dont get the argument though
ur saying all the go pro footage shows its flat too at 1200k feet ?
120k
120+
this argument is a waste of time its cool but
its cool knowing a concave object can go flat but not convex
A glober can’t survive arguments thinking nasa imagery is real.
It’s not a waste of time. It’s simply another nail in their belief’s coffin.
eh
its cool to know that but i wouldnt use it
I definitely use it.
i see that lol
So I can dismantle videos like the garlic bread being sent to space.
They’re going to be more careful now. Watch. They will edit, and cut video to ensure the horizon remains at a certain angle. To prevent bobbing.
They already are, really.
Because whenever the bobbing action happens, and we see the convex go concave, it’s verifiably a manipulated view.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/24/world/cookies-in-space-scn-trnd/index.html
Why would they lie if they can just present the actual reality and still pocket some money off their budget
Strawman argument.
The horizon is supposed to be at 3.2 miles for a 6 foot tall person but we can prove that not to be true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lJv44-ZyZw
@Riska are you serious? let's do a little thought exercise. By how much would their annual $20 billion space program budget decrease if people realized there is no space? <:Think2:617752763304247334>
1%?
10%?
100%?
150%
Hmm yeah i didn't think of that
