So do we, but you dont show it 😂

You have none.

Oh really?

Oh my god

Where do I post pictures

Answer with a statement derek, not a question

What is your number one proof of a ball earth that passes the scientific method?

I am just gonna say something at last

Thats a question @Derek Nelson , not a statement

Never argue with an Idiot, they'll drag you down to their Level and beat you with their ignorance

You didnt answer the question I asked before Derek

So you don’t have an answer.

Thank you.

Where do u post pictures to prove you wrong

Neither do you then

Answer this @Derek Nelson

Assuming the earth is flat, how come current seismic models based on the globe earth work?

Wait

Hold up

Faf

BND is controlled opposition he said earlier that he was a flat earther, beware

a substance that has no fixed shape and yields easily to external pressure; a gas or (especially) a liquid

Fluid

Air is a fluid

They are a trio.

So i guess you dont have an answer to my question amongst you leaps of evidence @Derek Nelson ?

The burden of proof is on the ball.

Name your number one proof that passes the scientific method.

No it isnt, you guys are proposing the new theory: you have to prove it right.

Yes it is, lol.

Have a great day. Thank you for forfeiting the debate.

@Derek Nelson tell me, how can every planet be a globe, but the Earth is Not?

^^^

I think i killed him

Lmao

@BND prove that earth is a planet spinning around

1. We have observed a meteor hitting the earth and forming a crater. We have observed the alien material left behind by these meteors (meteorite). We know this is alien material because it can only be naturally found in meteor sites.

2. As seismic waves pass through the Earth, they are refracted, or bent.
Because the speed of the seismic waves depends on density, we can use the travel-time of seismic waves to map change in density with depth, and show that the Earth is composed of several layers.

3. The example you use to dismiss isotopic dating as "flawed" consists of a scientist using a sample of dacite which was known to being formed from a 1986 magma flow. You need to have a basic understanding of the radiometric dating technique used called K-Ar, or potassium-argon. This dating technique depends on the fact that the radioactive isotope of potassium, 40K, naturally decays into other elements, as do all unstable radioactive elements. You need to have a statistically meaningful amount of argon before your result would be considered significant. Below about 10,000 years, potassium-argon results are not significant; there's not yet enough argon created. 

4: It is not true that a meteor always hits at a 90 degree angle. Craters are formed from blast impact. While most of the craters have a circular size, there have been craters observed with a elliptical shape.

5: What we have observed is that particles smaller than 6mm clump together to form bigger rocks, and that rocks that are bigger, pull more objects towards them, in a low to no gravity environment. @He Cute

Air is a fluid but the particles are so far apart that it doesn't obstruct vision

Prove that the Earth is Flat @He Cute