Haven't heard one

Pressure gradient for example is a gradient, goes from high pressure to low, so I see no issue with that

The same thing that creates the gradient sorta solves that

https://fecore.org/project/laser-experiment/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u-hEk0Rac0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_level_(device)

Nothing to do with pressure, and you can find out that those all can happen on a spherical earth

forget pressure

Aah, sure

this is about measuring the surface

no curvature measured

objects seen too far

anyway, do what you want with the information. doesn't matter to us 🙂

you can only lead a horse to water

good luck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLuDoTG7Vz8

Man I wish I could post pics

Useless without them this

Imma go with the evidence from behind the curve, good tests

great. go with it 😉

no need to hang around here then.

Image by @maleman

Thoughts?

No curve

Or?

If photos showing earth’s convexity at high altitude were real, you’re not allowed to zoom to make the curve disappear.

This is how we know high altitude photos showing earth convexity, are all fake.

We could take a fisheye to that basically flat zoomed in basketball, and produce both curves. (Rendering the argument that high altitude photos showing earth curve are real, inarguable.)

Yeah, that ball is flat

No curvature seen

I don't have a fish eye lense, can you show me someone making a flat surface concave and convex with a lense, and failing that with a curved surface?

Pls tell me none of u unironically believe in flat earth

Irony is dead, flat earth killed it

Flat earth isn’t a belief, it’s an observable and measurable fact

Like flat basketballs