my point is

I'd agree with you. water on a globe is also level

in a vacuum there's very little air to transfer heat

so while the temperature may be very high the actual energy contained within that area will be low

waterALWAYS finds level, even at 120,000fty altitude

uh

yea

it's pulled down by gravity

water on a GLOBE is not LEVEL, it is ROUND

and it's a liquid

it is BENT

that's not what level means...

yeah but how can the earth appear completely LEVEL at 120,000ft?

why are you capitalizing words like that

trying to make sure we're focusing on the same questions here

we seem to be all over the place

what's the actual point being disputed

how newly have you guys started researching this topic?

oh, years

depends on your definition i guess

lemme redefine that in a different language

though i dont know how that's very relevant

milyen régen kezted ezt a témát kutatni?

well I was simply curious because theres low level questions that get answereed after months of researching

then theres higher level questions that take years

no matter what topic I threw out Im getting no research indication

you havent really answered them though

why would it take years?

no research indication??

it took me over 2 years to even consider flat earth to be truthful

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/Comparison_US_standard_atmosphere_1962.svg/829px-Comparison_US_standard_atmosphere_1962.svg.png

Earth curvature is simple. When we don’t see any, why should we keep believing there is?

ok so

originally you were talking about vacuums

Topics like that can take more time.

and you didn't really answer me on that

definitely, Derek

octo i specifically said im not going into vacuums again because we completely go over each other

my stronger point of debate

is that photo i provided